Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Impact of azelnidipine and amlodipine on left ventricular mass and longitudinal function in hypertensive patients
Hirohiko Motoki1, Jun Koyama, Atsushi Izawa
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Insights
This study compared azelnidipine and amlodipine in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Both drugs effectively reduced blood pressure and improved cardiac structure and function over 12 months.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Long-acting calcium channel blockers (CCBs) impact on left ventricular (LV) function and morphology in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy is not fully understood.
- This study investigates serial changes in LV function and morphology.
- Comparison between azelnidipine and amlodipine is crucial for understanding their differential effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on serial changes in left ventricular (LV) function and morphology.
- To evaluate the impact of these calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy.
- To utilize conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography for detailed assessment.
Main Methods:
- 32 hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy were prospectively assigned to receive either amlodipine (5 mg/day) or azelnidipine (16 mg/day).
- Conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography were used to assess LV function and morphology.
- Examinations were conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment initiation.
Main Results:
- Both amlodipine and azelnidipine significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 1 month.
- Significant reductions in septal thickness and LV mass index were observed at 6 and 12 months.
- Improvements in global longitudinal strain were noted earlier (3 months) compared to transmitral flow and diastolic function (12 months). Global circumferential strain also improved by 3 months.
Conclusions:
- Azelnidipine demonstrates beneficial effects on LV mass regression, transmitral flow, tissue Doppler, and LV longitudinal strain.
- These effects are comparable to those of amlodipine.
- Both CCBs offer significant improvements in cardiac remodeling and function in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy.
Background:
The impact of long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB) administration on serial changes in left ventricular (LV) function and morphology in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy remains unclear. This study attempted to clarify this impact by comparing the effects of administration of azelnidipine with that of amlodipine using conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography.
Methods:
An equal number (16) of 32 hypertensive patients was prospectively assigned to a group administered 5 mg of amlodipine/day or a group administered 16 mg of azelnidipine/day. LV function and morphology was examined by conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation.
Results:
Both groups were found to have experienced a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure by 1 month after treatment initiation; a significant reduction in septal thickness and LV mass index at 6 and 12 months. Transmitral flow E/A ratio and early diastolic mitral annular velocity at lateral wall significantly improved at 12 months. On the other hand, a significant improvement of global longitudinal strain was observed earlier than the above indexes at 3, 6, and 12 months. Ar-A duration difference was significantly decreased at 3 months. The global circumferential strain improved significantly at 3 months, but there were no significant changes in mid-/apical circumferential and radial strains throughout the study period.
Conclusion:
Azelnidipine has beneficial effects on LV mass regression, transmitral flow, tissue Doppler, and LV longitudinal strain that are comparable to those of amlodipine on the same parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

