Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

925
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
925
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.0K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

L-TGVN: Leveraging Longitudinal Priors for Personalized Rapid MRI.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Software-defined Radar for MRI Motion Correction: A versatile, vendor-independent Platform.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Single-Shot 2D Radial Echo Planar Imaging for Functional MRI.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

Seeing my way.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2026
Same author

Correction of Respiratory Motion in Free-Breathing DCE-MRI Using a Pilot-Tone Coil.

NMR in biomedicine·2026
Same author

Accurate, fair, and generalisable scaling of injury severity score-based AI with demographics in terms of mortality in patients with trauma: multi-centre, multi-national retrospective cohort study.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Design of an 8-Channel Transmit 32-Channel Receive 11.7T Head Coil and Evaluation of SNR Gains.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

The Potential for Absolute Temperature Imaging Based on Brain Metabolites Using an FID-Shifting Approach in Gradient Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging (GREPSI).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration
05:30

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration

Published on: May 19, 2023

1.8K

Rapid and accurate T2 mapping from multi-spin-echo data using Bloch-simulation-based reconstruction.

Noam Ben-Eliezer1, Daniel K Sodickson, Kai Tobias Block

  • 1The Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York, University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|March 21, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article introduces a new computational method to create accurate T2 relaxation maps from fast magnetic resonance imaging scans. By using computer simulations to model how signals behave during complex pulse sequences, the researchers successfully removed artifacts that usually distort these measurements. This approach allows for quicker clinical scans without sacrificing data quality.

Keywords:
T2 mappingquantitative MRIquantitative MRIsignal processingecho-modulation curvepulse sequence optimization

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.5K
Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy as a Unique Probe for Lipid Membrane Dynamics and Membrane-Protein Interactions
10:02

Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy as a Unique Probe for Lipid Membrane Dynamics and Membrane-Protein Interactions

Published on: May 27, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration
05:30

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration

Published on: May 19, 2023

1.8K
Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.5K
Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy as a Unique Probe for Lipid Membrane Dynamics and Membrane-Protein Interactions
10:02

Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy as a Unique Probe for Lipid Membrane Dynamics and Membrane-Protein Interactions

Published on: May 27, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging physics within diagnostic radiology
  • Advanced T2 mapping techniques for clinical diagnostics

Background:

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging offers significant diagnostic potential for characterizing tissue properties. That uncertainty drove the need for reliable T2 relaxation measurements in clinical practice. Prior research has shown that standard multiecho sequences often suffer from signal contamination. Stimulated and indirect echoes frequently corrupt the resulting data. This gap motivated the development of faster acquisition protocols. However, these rapid methods traditionally trade off accuracy for speed. No prior work had resolved the challenge of correcting these specific signal artifacts efficiently. This study addresses the limitations inherent in existing fast imaging techniques.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this work is to develop a postprocessing approach for rapid and accurate T2 mapping. Researchers sought to overcome the penalties associated with fast multiecho protocols. These protocols are often impaired by prohibitively long scan times. Alternatively, they suffer from signal contamination due to stimulated and indirect echoes. This study addresses the need for a robust reconstruction framework. The authors propose using Bloch simulations to estimate actual echo-modulation curves. This strategy intends to provide a solution that is independent of specific scanner variations. The investigation focuses on enabling high-quality quantitative imaging in a clinically feasible manner.

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a novel postprocessing strategy based on Bloch simulations. Investigators generated a comprehensive database of echo-modulation curves. These simulations accounted for various T2 values and transmit field scales. The team applied this database to identify the best match for experimental data. They processed both phantom models and human subjects to test the algorithm. The design focuses on correcting signal contamination from fast multiecho sequences. This approach avoids the long acquisition times typical of single spin-echo methods. The methodology provides a flexible framework for modeling complex signal behaviors.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that the proposed technique successfully reconstructs accurate relaxation maps. The generated images closely match those produced by traditional single spin-echo acquisition. Results remained consistent across the entire physiological range of values. The method effectively eliminated artifacts caused by stimulated and indirect echoes. Performance was stable regardless of the specific experimental settings or scanner variations. This approach enables high-quality quantitative imaging within clinically feasible timeframes. The researchers confirmed the validity of their model using both phantom and in vivo data. These findings demonstrate that simulation-based reconstruction significantly improves the reliability of rapid multiecho protocols.

Conclusions:

The authors demonstrate that their simulation-based framework successfully recovers accurate relaxation values. This approach effectively mitigates signal corruption from stimulated and indirect echoes. Synthesis and implications suggest that the method performs reliably across diverse experimental conditions. The results align well with traditional single spin-echo benchmarks. This technique provides a robust solution for achieving clinically viable scan durations. The researchers propose that the underlying model architecture remains highly flexible. Future applications could incorporate additional parameters like diffusion or field inhomogeneities. This work establishes a comprehensive basis for improving quantitative imaging workflows.

The researchers propose a postprocessing method that utilizes Bloch simulations to estimate echo-modulation curves. By comparing measured signal data against a precomputed database of simulated curves, the system identifies the most accurate relaxation value for every individual voxel within the image.

The authors employ a database of simulated echo-modulation curves. This repository covers a broad spectrum of relaxation times and transmit field scales, allowing the algorithm to match experimental signal patterns against known physical behaviors modeled through computational simulations.

A precise model of the echo-modulation curve is necessary because fast multiecho protocols introduce stimulated and indirect echoes. These artifacts contaminate the signal, making direct calculation unreliable without accounting for the specific pulse sequence physics through simulation.

The researchers utilize the simulated database to map experimental signal intensity to specific physical values. This data type acts as a reference frame, enabling the reconstruction algorithm to interpret complex signal decay patterns that would otherwise be distorted by rapid acquisition settings.

The team measured the consistency of their technique by comparing reconstructed maps against those derived from single spin-echo data. They observed that the values remained stable across the physiological range, confirming the method's accuracy in both phantom models and human subjects.

The authors suggest that this framework supports arbitrary acquisition schemes. They propose that the model can be extended to include other parameters, such as T1 relaxation, B1 transmit field scales, B0 field maps, or diffusion, potentially broadening the scope of quantitative clinical imaging.