Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Rat Model of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
Published on: September 28, 2018
Clinical identifiers for early-stage primary/idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: are we seeing the real picture?
Sarah Walmsley1, Peter G Osmotherly2, Darren A Rivett3
1S. Walmsley, MAppSc(Ortho Physio), Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia. sarah.walmsley@uon.edu.au.
Background:
Adhesive capsulitis is often difficult to diagnose in its early stage and to differentiate from other common shoulder disorders.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to validate any or all of the 8 clinical identifiers of early-stage primary/idiopathic adhesive capsulitis established in an earlier Delphi study.
Design:
This was a cross-sectional study.
Methods:
Sixty-four patients diagnosed with early-stage adhesive capsulitis by a physical therapist or medical practitioner were included in the study. Eight active and 8 passive shoulder movements and visual analog scale pain scores for each movement were recorded prior to and immediately following an intra-articular injection of corticosteroid and local anesthetic. Using the local anesthetic as the reference standard, pain relief of ≥70% for passive external rotation was deemed a positive anesthetic response (PAR).
Results:
Sixteen participants (25%) demonstrated a PAR. Univariate logistic regression identified that of the proposed identifiers, global loss of passive range of movement (odds ratio [OR]=0.26, P=.03), pain at the end of range of all measured active movements (OR=0.06, P=.02), and global loss of passive glenohumeral movements (OR=0.23, P=.02) were associated with a PAR. Following stepwise removal of the variables, pain at the end of range of all measured active movements remained the only identifier but was associated with reduced odds of a PAR.
Limitations:
The lack of a recognized reference standard for diagnosing early-stage adhesive capsulitis remains problematic in all related research.
Conclusions:
None of the clinical identifiers for early-stage adhesive capsulitis previously proposed by expert consensus have been validated in this study. Clinicians should be aware that commonly used clinical identifiers may not be applicable to this stage.
