Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Potential impact of Thai Kidney Transplant program on immunosuppressive utilization: an analysis of the national
K Pongpirul1, W A Pongpirul2, Y Avihingsanon3
1Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Thailand Research Center for Health Services System, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background:
The Thai Kidney Transplant (TKT) program was launched in October 2008 to promote transplantation among previously disadvantaged populations, using fixed-rate provider payment. This study investigated if the introduction of this program could alter the natural practice trends of immunosuppressive drug use.
Methods:
Data from the Thai Transplantation Registry were analyzed. The change in trend of immunosuppressive use was assessed using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) technique.
Results:
During 1987-2012, 3975 kidney transplantations were done. The average age of patients was 42 years and 62% were male. Chronic glomerulonephritis accounted for one third of those with known causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Eighty-six percent were on hemodialysis before transplantation. Prednisolone was used in 95.87% of all transplant recipients, whereas calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), mycophenolates (MPAs), azathioprine (AZA), and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis) were used in 95.67%, 64.22%, 12.25%, and 2.31%, respectively. Overall use after 2008 was decreased for AZA (18.16% to 3.40%) and mTORis (2.86% to 1.5%) but increased for MPAs (50.80% to 84.34%), CNIs (95.43% to 96.04%), and prednisolone (95.60% to 96.29%), as compared with before the program inception. The slopes of use trends of AZA, MPAs, and CNIs did not significantly marginally differ from their natural trends before the program inception (P = .496, .108, and .741, respectively). However, the natural increasing use trend of mTORis significantly changed to a decreasing pattern after the introduction of the TKT program (P = .018).
Conclusion:
Fixed-rate provider payment might interfere with the natural practice trends of immunosuppressive drug use.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

