Outcomes in pacemaker-dependent patients upgraded from conventional pacemakers to cardiac resynchronization
Evan Adelstein1, David Schwartzman1, Raveen Bazaz1
1University of Pittsburgh Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Insights
Patients without coronary artery disease (CAD) have a lower risk of shocks when upgraded to a CRT-defibrillator. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers may be suitable for these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
- Patients at low risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias may be suitable for upgrade to a CRT-defibrillator or CRT-pacemaker.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if coronary artery disease (CAD) predicts a higher risk of appropriate shocks in pacemaker-dependent patients upgraded to a CRT-defibrillator.
- To assess the role of myocardial scar in CAD-related ventricular arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- 157 pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmias were upgraded to CRT-defibrillators.
- Patients were grouped based on the presence (n=75) or absence (n=82) of significant CAD.
- Outcomes including survival, appropriate shocks, antitachycardia pacing, complications, and LVEF changes were compared.
Main Results:
- Patients with CAD had higher mortality (HR 2.55, P=.001) and a significantly higher risk of appropriate shocks (1 per 26 person-years vs. 1 per 362 person-years).
- Of 12 patients receiving appropriate shocks, 11 had CAD.
- LVEF improvement and end-systolic volume reduction were similar between groups, but CAD patients experienced more comorbidities.
Conclusions:
- Pacemaker-dependent patients without significant CAD have better survival and a low risk of appropriate shocks after upgrading to a CRT-defibrillator.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers may be a more appropriate choice for pacemaker-dependent patients without CAD.
Background:
Pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular dysfunction benefit from upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Those at low risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias may benefit similarly from upgrade to a CRT-defibrillator or CRT-pacemaker.
Objective:
To determine whether coronary artery disease (CAD), because of associated scar that supports reentry, predicts higher risk of appropriate shocks in pacemaker-dependent patients upgraded to a CRT-defibrillator.
Methods:
We grouped 157 pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and conventional pacemakers upgraded to CRT-defibrillators according to the presence (n = 75) or absence (n = 82) of significant CAD. Overall survival, risk of appropriate shocks and antitachycardia pacing, complications related to high-power system components, and LVEF and end-systolic volume changes were contrasted between groups.
Results:
Patients with CAD had more comorbidities and exhibited increased mortality during a follow-up of 59 ± 30 months (hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.49-4.36; P = .001). Of 12 patients with appropriate shocks, 11 had CAD. Time to first shock, antitachycardia pacing, and tachyarrhythmia therapy were significantly shorter in patients with CAD (P < .01). The risk of an appropriate shock in patients without CAD was 1 per 362 person-years compared with 1 shock per 26 person-years in patients with CAD. Complications specific to high-energy device components necessitated another procedure in 32 (20%) patients. LVEF improvement and end-systolic volume reduction were similar between groups.
Conclusions:
Among pacemaker-dependent patients with no prior ventricular arrhythmias upgraded from a pacemaker to a CRT-defibrillator, patients without significant CAD have fewer comorbidities, longer survival, and low risk of appropriate shocks than do patients with CAD. CRT-pacemakers may be appropriate in such patients without CAD.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VII: Nursing Management of Dysrhythmias


