Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for stable angina: meta-regression of
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo1, Umberto Barbero2, Claudio Moretti1
1Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Italy; Meta-analysis and Evidence based medicine Training in Cardiology (METCARDIO), Italy.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces stroke risk compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), especially in women. However, PCI increases revascularization risk, particularly for women and diabetic patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are revascularization strategies for stable angina.
- Their comparative effectiveness regarding mortality and myocardial infarction is established, but clinical variable impact on risk-benefit is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of clinical variables on the risk-benefit profile of PCI versus CABG in stable angina.
- To evaluate outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke.
Main Methods:
- Meta-regression analysis of 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 12,844 patients.
- Event rates were analyzed to determine interactions between baseline clinical features and revascularization choice.
Main Results:
- PCI significantly reduced stroke risk compared to CABG (30-day OR 0.36, follow-up OR 0.57).
- Stroke reduction with PCI was more pronounced in female patients.
- PCI was associated with higher repeat revascularization rates, especially in women and diabetic patients.
Conclusions:
- PCI offers a significant stroke risk reduction over CABG, particularly beneficial for women.
- The increased risk of repeat revascularization with PCI necessitates careful consideration, especially in female and diabetic populations.
Aims:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) perform similarly in terms of lowering mortality and myocardial infarction rates in patients with stable angina, except in subjects with high-risk lesions. PCI is burdened from higher rates of revascularization, but offers a reduction in stroke. To date, the impact of clinical variables on the risk-benefit assessment has not been established.
Methods And Results:
Using event rates as a dependent variable, meta-regression was performed to test whether an interaction existed between baseline clinical features (age, gender, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction and ejection fraction) and choice of revascularization, focusing on death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and stroke. 20 randomized clinical trials (RCT) including 12,844 patients with stable angina were included. Compared to CABG, PCI significantly reduced the risk of stroke, both at 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.36 [95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.62]) and at follow up (median=12 months, OR=0.57 [0.41-0.80]). This reduction in stroke was significantly higher in females (B=-0.12, p=0.03). For repeat revascularization, PCI performed worse than CABG, both in the overall population and in patients with multivessel disease (OR=4.71 [3.17-7.01]) and (OR=7.18 [4.32-11.93]). Women (B=3.4, p=0.01) and those with diabetes mellitus (B=1.8, p=0.002) were at increased risk of subsequent revascularization after PCI.
Conclusion:
PCI significantly reduces the risk of stroke compared to CABG particularly in female patients: however the risk of revascularization is increased with PCI, especially in women and in those with diabetes.
More Related Videos
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care