Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

674
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
674
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.6K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.6K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

490
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
490
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

363
It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...
363
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

15.4K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
15.4K
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

804
Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
804

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Polymorphisms in CLAUDIN1 and SPINK5 Influence Skin Absorption of Pyrene, Pyrimethanil, and Oxybenzone in Human Volunteers.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same author

Occurrence of PFAS in Cow's Milk: A Comparative Study of Swedish Farms near Contaminated Sites and Regional Dairy Production Facilities.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2026
Same author

Classification of industrial chemicals for respiratory chemosensory irritation using the TRPV1-expressing neuronal SH-SY5Y cell model and machine learning.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same author

Evidence of Malodorous Chloroanisoles in "Mold Houses" Was Omitted When Indoor Air Research Evolved.

Microorganisms·2025
Same author

Bayesian benchmark dose modeling analysis and derivation of points of departure for female reproductive toxicity following exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) - effects on reproductive hormones, folliculogenesis and estrous cyclicity.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2025
Same author

Carcinogenicity of automotive gasoline and some oxygenated gasoline additives.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

19.7K

Current modeling practice may lead to falsely high benchmark dose estimates.

Joakim Ringblom1, Gunnar Johanson1, Mattias Öberg1

  • 1Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Work Environment Toxicology, P.O. Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|March 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Benchmark dose modeling (BMD) can produce non-protective lower confidence limits (BMDLs) that exceed the true BMD. This occurs frequently with non-sigmoidal models, potentially underestimating chemical risks.

Keywords:
Benchmark doseDose–effectPoint of departureRisk assessmentSimulation

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.4K
Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

19.7K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.4K
Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling is a key method for chemical risk assessment.
  • Variability in data can lead to inaccurate BMD lower confidence limits (BMDLs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency and causes of non-protective BMDLs in current modeling practices.
  • To assess the impact of model selection on BMDL accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulations generated continuous data from realistic dose-effect curves.
  • Evaluated four dose groups, five dose placement scenarios, group sizes (5-50 animals), and coefficients of variation (5-15%).
  • BMD calculations used nested exponential models, common in BMD software.

Main Results:

  • Non-protective BMDLs, exceeding the true BMD, were frequently observed, reaching up to 80% in some scenarios.
  • This anomaly was primarily linked to the use of non-sigmoidal exponential models.
  • The model Effect=a·e(b)(·dose) was particularly associated with underestimating risk.

Conclusions:

  • Non-sigmoidal models in BMD analysis require cautious application due to the risk of underestimating chemical hazards.
  • Accurate model selection and robust identification of the point-of-departure are critical for reliable health risk assessment.