Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial
Vivek Y Reddy1, Reinoud E Knops, Johannes Sperzel
1Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (V.Y.R., M.A.M., S.R.D., J.S.K.); Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (R.E.K., J.R.d.G., A.A.M.W.); Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany (J.S.); Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic (J.P., J.S., L.S., P.N.); Nanostim, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA (P.J., A.O.); Department of Cardiology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic (J.K.).
Background:
Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker.
Methods And Results:
The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 77±8 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range.
Conclusions:
In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing.
Clinical Trial Registration Url:
http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations

