Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Is imatinib still the best choice as first-line oral TKI
1Department of Pediatric Oncology, Asian Institute of Oncology, K J Somaiya Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Abstract:
Targeted therapy is the buzz word these days. A decade back the emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib on the horizon, as the targeted therapy, had captured the imagination of everyone in the field of cancer. It is encouraging to see a large number of patients getting relief from deadly CML disease and leading a good quality of life with the help of this drug. However, sky is not the limit and now we have second and third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. I still remember the sagacious smile on the face of late Dr. John Goldman, when I asked him about his preferred choice and he replied and I quote "this is going to be the debate of the decade." Here I take the opportunity to contribute to this debate. I have scrutinized various aspects of the three TKIs, now recommended, for the treatment of CML. I'm still convinced it is too early to shift our practice completely towards 2G TKI as more time is required to make a clear recommendation.
Insights
Second and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) offer new options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. However, current evidence suggests it is premature to fully transition to 2G TKIs, requiring more long-term data.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), revolutionized chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment.
- Second-generation (2G) and third-generation (3G) TKIs have since emerged, expanding therapeutic options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To scrutinize and compare the aspects of three recommended TKIs for CML treatment.
- To contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the optimal TKI strategy for CML management.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of clinical data pertaining to Imatinib, 2G TKIs, and 3G TKIs.
- Comparative assessment of efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes.
Main Results:
- While 2G and 3G TKIs offer advancements, definitive conclusions on practice-wide adoption are pending.
- Extended observation periods are necessary to fully evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of newer TKIs.
Conclusions:
- It is currently too early to recommend a complete shift in clinical practice towards 2G TKIs for CML.
- Further long-term data is essential for making clear recommendations on the optimal use of next-generation TKIs in CML therapy.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
06:43Robotic Duodenal Sleeve Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Rare Exon 8 KIT Mutation Following Neoadjuvant Imatinib
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...