Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Dislocation after the first and multiple revision total hip arthroplasty: comparison between acetabulum-only,
Yona Kosashvili1, Michael Drexler1, David Backstein1
1The Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Insights
Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation risk is lower in first-time procedures. However, acetabulum-only revisions increase instability risk during initial THA.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Dislocation is a known complication of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Understanding risk factors for dislocation is crucial for improving patient outcomes in revision THA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between specific components revised (femur, acetabulum, or both) and dislocation rates in first-time versus multiple revision THA.
- To identify whether the type of component revision influences dislocation risk.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 749 consecutive revision THA cases performed between 1982 and 2005.
- Patients were categorized into three groups: femur-only revision, acetabulum-only revision, and both components revised.
- Dislocation rates were compared between first-time and repeated revisions, and within the first-time revision group based on component revised.
Main Results:
- First-time revision THA had significantly lower dislocation rates (5.69%) compared to repeated revisions (10.47%).
- In first-time revisions, acetabulum-only reconstructions showed significantly higher dislocation rates (10.28%) than revisions of both components (4.61%) or femur-only (0%).
Conclusions:
- While first-time revision THA generally has lower dislocation rates, acetabulum-only reconstructions present a higher risk of instability.
- Surgeons should be aware of the increased instability risk associated with acetabulum-only revisions during initial THA procedures.
Background:
Dislocation may complicate revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We examined the correlation between the components revised during hip arthroplasty (femur only, acetabulum only and both components) to the rates of dislocation in the first and multiple revision THA.
Methods:
We obtained data from consecutive revision THAs performed between January 1982 and December 2005. Patients were grouped into femur-only revision, acetabulum-only revision and revision THA for both components.
Results:
A total of 749 revision THAs performed during the study period met our inclusion criteria: 369 first-time revisions and 380 repeated revisions. Dislocation rates in patients undergoing first-time revisions (5.69%) were significantly lower than in those undergoing repeated revisions (10.47%; p = 0.022). Within the group of first-time revisions, dislocation rates for acetabulum-only revisions (10.28%) were significantly higher than those for both components (4.61%) and femur-only (0%) reconstructions (p = 0.025).
Conclusion:
Although patients undergoing first-time revisions had lower rates of dislocations than those undergoing repeated revisions, acetabulum-only reconstructions performed at first-time revision arthroplasty entailed an increased risk for instability.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
08:40Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
Published on: April 19, 2024