Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Acquisition of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in the Rat
Published on: August 28, 2021
Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled
1Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Insights
Dexmedetomidine premedication in children offers better sedation and reduces postoperative pain and agitation compared to midazolam. However, it may cause decreased heart rate, blood pressure, and a delayed start to sedation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Conflicting evidence exists regarding dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for pediatric premedication.
- This meta-analysis aims to clarify the comparative effectiveness of these two agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare dexmedetomidine with midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate sedation quality, postoperative outcomes, and adverse events.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Inclusion of 11 RCTs involving 829 children comparing dexmedetomidine and midazolam.
- Data extraction and analysis using the quality effects model to calculate relative risks and weighted mean differences.
Main Results:
- Dexmedetomidine showed superior sedation during parent separation and mask acceptance.
- It reduced the need for rescue analgesia, agitation, delirium, and shivering postoperatively.
- Adverse effects included decreased blood pressure, heart rate, and a longer onset of sedation.
Conclusions:
- Dexmedetomidine is more effective than midazolam for pediatric premedication regarding sedation and postoperative benefits.
- Clinicians should weigh the benefits against potential risks like hypotension and bradycardia.
Background:
In the current published literature, there are controversial results regarding the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam as premedication in children. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the use of dexmedetomidine as a premedication in pediatric patients with that of midazolam.
Methods:
We searched for articles published in English that matched the key words 'dexmedetomidine', 'midazolam', and 'children' in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of the retrieved articles. Only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of dexmedetomidine and midazolam as premedications in children were included. The extraction of data from the articles was performed independently by two authors using a predesigned Excel spreadsheet. The relative risks (RRs), weighted mean differences (WMDs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcome data using the quality effects model of the MetaXL version 1.3 software.
Results:
Eleven prospective RCTs (829 children) met our criteria. Compared with midazolam, dexmedetomidine premedication was associated with more satisfactory sedation upon parent separation (eight RCTs [679 children]; RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.46) and upon mask acceptance (seven RCTs [559 children]; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36). During the postoperative period, premedication with dexmedetomidine lowered the numbers of requests for rescue analgesia (six RCTs [477 children]; RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.74) and lowered the risks of agitation or delirium (seven RCTs with [466 children]; RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.88), and shivering (three RCTs [192 children]; RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.61). However, dexmedetomidine premedication reduced systolic blood pressure (three RCTs [242 children]; WMD: -11.47 mm·Hg(-1) ; 95% CI: -13.95, -8.98), mean blood pressure (three RCTs [202 children]; WMD: -5.66 mm·Hg(-1) ; 95% CI: -8.89, -2.43), and heart rate (six RCTs [444 children]; WMD: -12.71 beat·min(-1) ; 95% CI: -14.80, -10.62), and prolonged the onset of sedation (two RCTs [132 children] WMD: 13.78 min; 95% CI: 11.33, 16.23; I(2) = 0%) relative to midazolam.
Conclusion:
This meta-analysis demonstrated that dexmedetomidine premedication is superior to midazolam premedication in terms of producing satisfactory sedation upon parent separation and mask acceptance. Dexmedetomidine premedication provides clinical benefits that included reducing the requirements for rescue analgesia and reducing agitation or delirium and shivering during the postoperative period. However, the risks of heart rate and blood pressure decreases, and the prolonged onset of sedation associated with dexmedetomidine should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines work by enhancing the effects of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. They bind to the GABAA receptor, increasing its affinity for GABA, which opens chloride...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children