Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
10.9K
A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality
Sergey Gavrilets1, Laura Fortunato2
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.
Nature Communications
|March 27, 2014
Summary
High-ranking individuals may appear altruistic in group conflicts due to evolutionary pressures. This behavior, driven by resource competition and collective action, impacts social dynamics and leadership evolution.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Social behavior
- Game theory
Background:
- Intergroup conflict is common in social species, involving competition for resources.
- Understanding the evolution of social instincts in conflict is crucial for explaining group dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the evolutionary origins of social instincts shaped by between-group conflict.
- Analyze how individual differences influence evolutionary dynamics in collective action problems.
Main Methods:
- Developed theoretical models to simulate evolutionary dynamics.
- Focused on the role of individual rank, motivation, and resource control.
Main Results:
- High-rank individuals may exhibit seemingly altruistic behavior in intergroup conflict, expending more effort for lower reproductive success.
- Individual traits like motivation, strength, and cost influence behavior in conflict situations.
- Theoretical models support an evolutionary basis for equity theory and coercive leadership.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences significantly shape evolutionary trajectories in intergroup conflict.
- Seemingly altruistic acts by high-rank individuals can be explained by evolutionary self-interest within a collective action framework.
- The study offers insights into the evolution of leadership and reproductive skew.
Related Concept Videos
01:31In- and Out-Groups
28.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
28.5K
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
345
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
345
04:49Robbers Cave
13.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.5K
01:26Equity Theory
428
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
428
01:25Impact of Individuals on a Group
453
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
453
01:34Groupthink
37.0K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
37.0K