Learning about medical student mistreatment from responses to the medical school graduation questionnaire
Brian Mavis1, Aron Sousa, Wanda Lipscomb
1Dr. Mavis is associate professor and director, Office of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Sousa is senior associate dean of academic affairs and associate professor of medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Lipscomb is senior associate dean for diversity and inclusion, associate dean for student affairs, and associate professor of psychiatry, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Rappley is dean and professor of pediatrics and human development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Abstract:
Although evidence of medical student mistreatment has accumulated for more than 20 years, only recently have professional organizations like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the American Medical Association truly acknowledged it as an issue. Since 1991, the AAMC's annual Medical School Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) has included questions about mistreatment. Responses to the GQ have become the major source of evidence of the prevalence and types of mistreatment. This article reviews national mistreatment data, using responses to the GQ from 2000 through 2012; examines how students' experiences have changed over time; and highlights the implications of this information for the broader medical education system. The authors discuss what mistreatment is, including the changing definitions from the GQ; the prevalence, types, and sources of mistreatment; and evidence of students reporting incidents. In addition, they discuss next steps, including better defining mistreatment, specifically public humiliation and belittling, taking into account students' subjective evaluations; understanding and addressing the influence of institutional culture and what institutions can learn from current approaches at other institutions; and developing better systems to report and respond to reports of mistreatment. They conclude with a discussion of how mistreatment currently is conceptualized within the medical education system and the implications of that conceptualization for eradicating mistreatment in the future.
Insights
Medical student mistreatment is a persistent issue, with data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) revealing trends over time. Addressing mistreatment requires better definitions, understanding institutional culture, and improved reporting systems.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Student Well-being
- Healthcare Professionalism
Background:
- Medical student mistreatment has been documented for over two decades.
- Professional organizations like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) are increasingly acknowledging this issue.
- The AAMC's Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) has been a primary source for data on mistreatment since 1991.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review national data on medical student mistreatment from 2000-2012 using GQ responses.
- To examine changes in student mistreatment experiences over time.
- To discuss implications for the medical education system and suggest future directions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of national mistreatment data from AAMC Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) responses.
- Review of data spanning the years 2000 through 2012.
- Examination of trends in prevalence, types, and sources of mistreatment.
Main Results:
- Provides an overview of the prevalence and types of medical student mistreatment.
- Highlights changes in student experiences with mistreatment over the study period.
- Discusses the reporting of mistreatment incidents by students.
Conclusions:
- Mistreatment definitions, particularly public humiliation and belittling, need refinement considering subjective student experiences.
- Understanding and addressing institutional culture is crucial for mitigating mistreatment.
- Developing enhanced systems for reporting and responding to mistreatment is essential for eradication.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Obedience
Ethics in Research
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
The Scientific Method
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:


