Learning about medical student mistreatment from responses to the medical school graduation questionnaire

Brian Mavis1, Aron Sousa, Wanda Lipscomb

  • 1Dr. Mavis is associate professor and director, Office of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Sousa is senior associate dean of academic affairs and associate professor of medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Lipscomb is senior associate dean for diversity and inclusion, associate dean for student affairs, and associate professor of psychiatry, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Rappley is dean and professor of pediatrics and human development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Insights

Medical student mistreatment is a persistent issue, with data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) revealing trends over time. Addressing mistreatment requires better definitions, understanding institutional culture, and improved reporting systems.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Student Well-being
  • Healthcare Professionalism

Background:

  • Medical student mistreatment has been documented for over two decades.
  • Professional organizations like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) are increasingly acknowledging this issue.
  • The AAMC's Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) has been a primary source for data on mistreatment since 1991.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review national data on medical student mistreatment from 2000-2012 using GQ responses.
  • To examine changes in student mistreatment experiences over time.
  • To discuss implications for the medical education system and suggest future directions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of national mistreatment data from AAMC Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) responses.
  • Review of data spanning the years 2000 through 2012.
  • Examination of trends in prevalence, types, and sources of mistreatment.

Main Results:

  • Provides an overview of the prevalence and types of medical student mistreatment.
  • Highlights changes in student experiences with mistreatment over the study period.
  • Discusses the reporting of mistreatment incidents by students.

Conclusions:

  • Mistreatment definitions, particularly public humiliation and belittling, need refinement considering subjective student experiences.
  • Understanding and addressing institutional culture is crucial for mitigating mistreatment.
  • Developing enhanced systems for reporting and responding to mistreatment is essential for eradication.

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.3K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
26.2K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.7K
Torts III01:26

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
1.5K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.2K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.3K