Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Harvesting of Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft
Published on: September 2, 2025
Outcome of anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach
Hiroshi Amano1, Yukiyoshi Toritsuka, Ryohei Uchida
1Department of Orthopaedics, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3, Nagasonecho, Kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Purpose:
To evaluate the clinical outcome of anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using multistranded hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach.
Methods:
One hundred and twenty-one patients (mean age 28 ± 10 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction were examined. Using an outside-in femoral drill guide, an upper femoral tunnel for the anteromedial (AM) graft was created just below the superior articular cartilage margin of the medial wall of the lateral condyle through a small incision. A lower femoral tunnel for the posterolateral (PL) graft was drilled in the centre of the inferior-posterior half of the attachment area behind the resident's ridge in the same manner. Two tibial tunnels were created at the centre of the AM and PL bundle footprints of a normal ACL. Patients were evaluated at 24 months postoperatively.
Results:
According to the IKDC form, 52 knees (43 %) were graded as normal, 64 (53 %) as nearly normal, 1 (1 %) as abnormal and 4 (3 %) as graft rupture due to re-injury. Loss of knee extension of <5° was observed in one patient (1 %). Among 111 patients who were directly evaluated, none showed loss of flexion of <5°. Lachman sign was negative in 103 patients (93 %), while the pivot shift test result was negative or equivalent to that of the contralateral healthy knee in 103 patients (93 %). The mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-2000 arthrometer(®) was 0.9 ± 1.1 mm, and 94 % of patients showed a range between -1 and +2 mm.
Conclusion:
The anatomical double-bundle outside-in ACL reconstruction provided a satisfactory short-term outcome.
Level Of Evidence:
Case series, Level IV.

