Polymorphism in 3' untranslated region of the pig PPARA gene influences its transcript level and is associated with...

The PPARA (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α) gene encodes a nuclear receptor that plays an important role in fatty acid catabolism by transcriptional regulation of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation and can be considered as a candidate gene for fatness traits in the pig. The aim of the study was to search for a functional polymorphism in 3' untranslated region (UTR), their association with production traits, and postnatal PPARA transcript level in 2 skeletal muscles (longissimus and semimembranosus) of 5 commercial pig breeds (Polish Landrace [PL], Polish Large White [PLW], Duroc, Pietrain, and Pulawska). Altogether, 9 novel polymorphisms (8 SNP and 1 indel) were found in the 3' UTR. The in silico analysis revealed 6 putative microRNA target sequences in the analyzed region. The c.*636A>G substitution was widely distributed across breeds and located near the putative target sequence for miR-224. The relative PPARA transcript level was higher (P < 0.05) in LM of AA than in those of GG homozygous animals for SNP c.*636A>G. The luciferase assay revealed that miR-224 probably acts as a negative regulator of the PPARA expression in pig adipocytes (P = 2.9 × 10(-7)), but we did not observe the effect of the A or G alleles on the interaction between miR-224 and its putative target sequence. We hypothesize that the 2 predominant haplotypes, differing at 4 sites (including c.*636A>G), present different architecture of its 3' UTR and it could affect the level of the transcript. The c.*636A>G SNP, analyzed in PL and PLW, was significantly associated with backfat thickness at 3 points (P < 0.05) and intramuscular fat content (P < 0.01) in PL. Suggestive associations were found between 4 SNP (c.*321A>C, c.*324G>C, c.*626T>C, and c.*636A>G) and fatty acid contents in LM and subcutaneous and visceral fat tissue of PL, PLW, Duroc and Pietrain pigs. The PPARA mRNA level was higher in semimembranosus muscle than in LM (P = 8.38 × 10(-12)) in a general comparison and the same trend was found in most breeds (except for PL) and at all tested days of age (60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 210 d). The effect of breed was highly significant in a general comparison (P = 0.48 × 10(-8)), but there was no common expression pattern in both muscles among different age groups. We conclude that the c.*636A>G SNP in the PPARA gene can be considered in PL breed as a useful genetic marker for adipose tissue accumulation.