Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

08:45
Study of Siphon Breaker Experiment and Simulation for a Research Reactor
Published on: September 26, 2017
8.4K
DSMC simulation and experimental validation of shock interaction in hypersonic low density flow.
Hong Xiao1, Yuhe Shang1, Di Wu1
1School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China.
Thescientificworldjournal
|March 28, 2014
Summary
Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) simulations accurately predict hypersonic shock interactions. The hard sphere (HS) model offers the best agreement with experimental data across various flow conditions.
Area of Science:
- Aerospace Engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Hypersonics
Background:
- Hypersonic flows present complex shock interactions.
- Low-density environments exacerbate simulation challenges.
- Accurate modeling of intermolecular collisions is crucial for Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) models for hypersonic shock interactions in low-density flows.
- To compare the performance of different molecular collision models (hard sphere, variable hard sphere, variable soft sphere) within DSMC simulations.
- To assess the impact of Knudsen number and intermolecular interaction models on simulation accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) simulations were performed.
- Three molecular collision models were employed: hard sphere (HS), variable hard sphere (VHS), and variable soft sphere (VSS).
- Simulations covered double-cone and Edney's type IV hypersonic shock interactions in low-density flow.
Main Results:
- All three molecular models predicted trends for pressure coefficient and Stanton number in double-cone interactions.
- The HS model demonstrated the best agreement with experimental data for both double-cone and Edney's type IV shock interactions.
- DSMC errors were found to depend on the Knudsen number and the chosen intermolecular interaction model, decreasing with increasing Knudsen number.
Conclusions:
- The hard sphere (HS) molecular model provides the most accurate results for hypersonic shock interactions in low-density flows using DSMC.
- DSMC simulations with HS and VHS models show good agreement for Edney's type IV shock interactions, while VSS model performance is less reliable.
- Simulation accuracy is significantly influenced by the Knudsen number and intermolecular interaction models, with errors within 10% for Knudsen numbers around 10⁻⁴.
Related Concept Videos
Laminar and Turbulent Flow
9.7K
Fluid dynamics is the study of fluids in motion. Velocity vectors are often used to illustrate fluid motion in applications like meteorology. For example, wind—the fluid motion of air in the atmosphere—can be represented by vectors indicating the speed and direction of the wind at any given point on a map. Another method for representing fluid motion is a streamline. A streamline represents the path of a small volume of fluid as it flows. When the flow pattern changes with time, the...
9.7K
Typical Model Studies
842
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
842
Pressure Variation in a Fluid at Rest
1.1K
In a fluid at rest, the pressure at any point beneath the fluid surface depends solely on the depth, not on the container's shape or size. This principle, known as hydrostatic pressure, arises because, in stationary fluids, there is no acceleration, meaning the forces within the fluid balance out. Only vertical forces, caused by the weight of the fluid above, contribute to pressure changes with depth.
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in...
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in...
1.1K
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
1.1K
Understanding steady, laminar flow between parallel plates is essential for analyzing and designing flow in narrow rectangular channels, commonly found in various water conveyance and drainage systems. The Navier-Stokes equations govern fluid motion and are generally challenging to solve due to their nonlinearity. However, simplifications are possible in certain cases, like the steady laminar flow between parallel plates. For this scenario, we assume steady, incompressible, laminar flow.
1.1K
Shock Waves
2.1K
While deriving the Doppler formula for the observed frequency of a sound wave, it is assumed that the speed of sound in the medium is greater than the source's speed through it. When this condition is breached, a shock wave occurs.
When the source's speed approaches the speed of sound, constructive interference between successive wavefronts emitted by the source occurs immediately behind it. Initially, scientists believed that this constructive interference would result in such high...
When the source's speed approaches the speed of sound, constructive interference between successive wavefronts emitted by the source occurs immediately behind it. Initially, scientists believed that this constructive interference would result in such high...
2.1K
Turbulent Flow
921
Turbulent flow is characterized by unpredictable fluctuations in velocity and pressure, which result in a chaotic fluid movement distinct from the orderly patterns of laminar flow. While laminar flow is governed by smooth, parallel layers with minimal mixing, turbulent flow exhibits highly irregular, three-dimensional patterns. This behavior arises due to instabilities in the fluid's velocity profile, and amplifies as the flow velocity increases. Minor disturbances, known as turbulent...
921

