Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Estimating climate resilience for conservation across geophysical settings
Mark G Anderson1, Melissa Clark, Arlene Olivero Sheldon
1The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Conservation Science, Eastern North America Division, Boston, MA, 02111, U.S.A.. manderson@tnc.org.
Conservationists can now identify resilient natural areas for biodiversity conservation. This new method maps geophysical settings to find sites likely to support species and ecosystems adapting to climate change.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Climate Change Adaptation
Background:
- Conserving biological diversity requires methods that accommodate species and community shifts due to climate change.
- Existing conservation strategies may not adequately address climate-driven ecological rearrangements.
- Developing resilient conservation sites is crucial for long-term biodiversity maintenance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and test a method for identifying resilient conservation sites in northeastern North America.
- To integrate physical features related to ecological diversity and climate resilience into conservation planning.
- To compare the effectiveness of the developed method with existing conservation site selections.
Main Methods:
- Mapped 30 distinct geophysical settings based on geology and elevation across northeastern North America.
- Identified resilient sites within each setting by scoring connectivity via natural cover and microclimate indicators (topography, elevation gradients).
- Selected sites scoring above 0.5 standard deviations from the mean combined score for resilience and connectivity.
Main Results:
- The developed method identified sites that captured significantly more biodiversity than expected by chance (p < 0.0001).
- Selected sites included 75% of target species, 49% of target species locations, and 53% of target community locations.
- Settings with calcareous bedrock, coarse sand, and fine silt showed lower resilience and protection.
Conclusions:
- The method effectively identifies natural strongholds for future conservation under climate change.
- This approach captures substantial existing biodiversity and addresses biases in current land protection.
- It provides a framework for proactive conservation planning that accounts for ecological adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
What is Climate?
Conservation of Declining Populations
Responses to Drought and Flooding

