Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.6K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.6K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

666
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
666
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attentive pre-training question embeddings for knowledge tracing with semantically-enhanced knowledge structure and concept label-guided heterogeneous graph representation.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2026
Same author

Comparative evaluation of the Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model and mMKM for carbon ion treatment planning: A matRad-based analysis.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same author

A feasibility study on a machine-learning-based quality assurance tool for spot-scanning proton therapy using delivery log files and treatment plans.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Computed Tomography Simulation for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Impact on Target Coverage.

Journal of medical physics·2026
Same author

Novel use of peak optimized particle therapy for the delivery of three-dimensional spatially fractionated radiotherapy.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Simulation and optimization of treatment schedule for multi-gantry heavy ion therapy.

Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Prophylactic versus therapeutic sucralfate in patients at high risk for radiation esophagitis: randomized controlled trial.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Do Uniform Fasting Instructions Lead to Reproducible Stomach Volumes in Patients Being Treated with Radiation to the Pancreas?

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Tri-APBI: Single Institution Phase I/II Prospective Clinical Trial of Three Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation for Stage 0-I Breast Cancer.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Departmental Peer Review and Implementation into Resident Didactics.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Breast Cancer Reirradiation Practice Patterns: An International Survey From the Reirradiation Collaborative Group (ReCOG).

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

MRI-based atlas for prostate bed recurrence after radical prostatectomy: consistency of CTV delineation with 7 contouring guidelines.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

559

Catching errors with patient-specific pretreatment machine log file analysis.

Dharanipathy Rangaraj1, Mingyao Zhu1, Deshan Yang1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

Practical Radiation Oncology
|March 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine log file analysis offers a robust quality assurance (QA) process for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This method efficiently detects errors missed by traditional dosimetric measurements, improving treatment safety.

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

16.5K
Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids
06:53

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids

Published on: June 8, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

559
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

16.5K
Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids
06:53

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids

Published on: June 8, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Modern external beam radiation therapy requires robust quality assurance (QA) for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
  • Traditional QA methods like point and planar dosimetric measurements have limitations in detecting certain delivery errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To report the clinical implementation and results of a semiautomatic, pretreatment QA process using dynamic machine log file analysis.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of this QA process for IMRT treatments delivered by high energy linear accelerators.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an in-house program, "Dynalog QA," to analyze Varian multileaf collimator (MLC) log files (Dynalog).
  • Compared beam delivery parameters from log files with treatment plans to identify discrepancies.
  • Constructed and compared fluence maps of delivered versus planned beams.

Main Results:

  • Performed 912 machine log file analyses between June 2009 and end of 2010.
  • Detected 14 errors causing dosimetric deviation, attributed to human error, planning flaws, or data transfer issues.
  • Identified 174 minor errors, including false positives, with origins discussed.

Conclusions:

  • Machine log file analysis is a robust, efficient, and reliable QA process for IMRT.
  • This method effectively detects errors missed by conventional dosimetric measurements.
  • The QA process enhances patient safety by identifying critical errors in treatment delivery.