Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer
Sandra V Kotsis1, Kevin C Chung
1Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the University of Michigan Health System; and the Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School.
Abstract:
Many instructional guides have been published on how to write scientific papers. Likewise, many published articles have focused on the reasons why submitted manuscripts are rejected. However, fewer publications have been presented to guide authors on how to address reviewers' comments in a manuscript revision. Even fewer counsel authors on how to deal with a rejection decision. In this article, the authors present a literature review on the strategies to get a manuscript accepted, despite an initial unfavorable review. The authors share their experience with addressing reviewers' comments to get a manuscript accepted and published. Finally, the authors discuss the process of peer review and offer tips on how to be an effective peer reviewer.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Proofreading
Proofreading
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
Review and Preview
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

