Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
Published on: September 26, 2017
How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects
Bertrand Morandi1, Hervé Piégay1, Nicolas Lamouroux2
1Université de Lyon, UMR 5600 EVS - CNRS, ENS de Lyon, 18, rue Chevreul, Lyon 69007, France.
Abstract:
Since the 1990s, French operational managers and scientists have been involved in the environmental restoration of rivers. The European Water Framework Directive (2000) highlights the need for feedback from restoration projects and for evidence-based evaluation of success. Based on 44 French pilot projects that included such an evaluation, the present study includes: 1) an introduction to restoration projects based on their general characteristics 2) a description of evaluation strategies and authorities in charge of their implementation, and 3) a focus on the evaluation of results and the links between these results and evaluation strategies. The results show that: 1) the quality of an evaluation strategy often remains too poor to understand well the link between a restoration project and ecological changes; 2) in many cases, the conclusions drawn are contradictory, making it difficult to determine the success or failure of a restoration project; and 3) the projects with the poorest evaluation strategies generally have the most positive conclusions about the effects of restoration. Recommendations are that evaluation strategies should be designed early in the project planning process and be based on clearly-defined objectives.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Ecological Succession
Responses to Drought and Flooding

