Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Porcine Liver Transplantation Without Veno-Venous Bypass As an Extended Criteria Donor Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
Hepatitis C disease severity in living versus deceased donor liver transplant recipients: an extended observation
Norah A Terrault1, R Todd Stravitz, Anna S F Lok
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Insights
Living donor liver transplants (LDLT) do not impact hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease progression or survival rates compared to deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT). Donor type does not influence advanced fibrosis or graft loss in HCV-infected recipients.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Transplantation immunology
- Virology
Background:
- Donor factors can influence hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease severity in liver transplant (LT) recipients.
- Living donors, often younger with shorter cold ischemic times, might offer advantages for HCV-infected patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) impacts advanced fibrosis and graft loss in HCV-infected recipients compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of HCV-infected patients from the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) surviving over 90 days.
- Assessment of advanced fibrosis (Ishak stage ≥3) and graft loss, with a median follow-up of 4.7 years.
Main Results:
- The 5-year cumulative risk of advanced fibrosis was similar between LDLT (44%) and DDLT (37%) recipients (P=0.16).
- Patient and graft survival rates at 5 years were comparable for LDLT and DDLT.
- Biliary strictures and higher AST levels at LT were associated with advanced fibrosis and graft loss, but LDLT was not a significant factor.
Conclusions:
- Donor type does not affect the probability of advanced fibrosis or patient and graft survival in HCV-infected recipients.
- While LDLT reduces wait times, it does not appear to offer benefits for HCV disease progression.
- Biliary strictures and high AST at LT are significant predictors of fibrosis and graft loss post-transplant.
Unlabelled:
Donor factors influence hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease severity in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Living donors, because they are typically young and have short cold ischemic times, may be advantageous for HCV-infected patients. Among HCV-infected patients in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) surviving >90 days and followed for a median 4.7 years, advanced fibrosis (Ishak stage ≥3) and graft loss were determined. The 5-year cumulative risk of advanced fibrosis was 44% and 37% in living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT) patients (P = 0.16), respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity at LT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.38 for doubling of AST, P = 0.005) and biliary strictures (HR = 2.68, P = 0.0001) were associated with advanced fibrosis, but LDLT was not (HR = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.69, P = 0.63). The 5-year unadjusted patient and graft survival probabilities were 79% and 78% in LDLT, and 77% and 75% in DDLT (P = 0.43 and 0.32), with 27% and 20% of LDLT and DDLT graft losses due to HCV (P = 0.45). Biliary strictures (HR = 2.25, P = 0.0006), creatinine at LT (HR = 1.74 for doubling of creatinine, P = 0.0004), and AST at LT (HR = 1.36 for doubling of AST, P = 0.004) were associated with graft loss, but LDLT was not (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.49-1.18, P = 0.23).
Conclusion:
Donor type does not affect the probability of advanced fibrosis or patient and graft survival in HCV-infected recipients. Thus, while LDLT offers the advantage of shorter wait times, there is no apparent benefit for HCV disease progression. Biliary strictures have a negative effect on HCV fibrosis severity and graft survival, and a high AST at LT may be an important predictor of fibrosis risk post-LT.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Cirrhosis II: Pathophysiology
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow

