Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

384
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
384
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

596
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
596
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System01:29

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

6.5K
The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
6.5K
Area Between Curves: Problem Solving01:27

Area Between Curves: Problem Solving

211
A region can be enclosed by three curves: a square root function, a reflected cube root function, and a linear function. The linear function intersects each of the other two curves, and these intersection points determine where the boundary of the enclosed region changes. Because different curves serve as the upper and lower boundaries in different parts of the graph, the area cannot be found using a single setup over the entire interval.To compute the area, the region is first divided into two...
211
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

1.6K
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is employment group insurance financing of expensive gene therapies threatened in the United States?

Health affairs scholar·2024
Same author

Externalities in the wildland-urban interface: Private decisions, collective action, and results from wildfire simulation models for California.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2023
Same author

A reprogrammable mechanical metamaterial with stable memory.

Nature·2021
Same author

Effects of the ACA on Health Care Cost Containment.

LDI issue brief·2017
Same author

Editorial: Relaunch of the journal.

International journal of health economics and management·2016
Same author

Medical employment growth, unemployment, and the opportunity cost of health care.

International journal of health economics and management·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K

Cost-effectiveness analysis and insurance coverage: solving a puzzle.

Mark Pauly1

  • 1Health Care Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Health Economics
|March 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study re-evaluates cost-effectiveness analysis for health programs with insurance cost sharing. It demonstrates that cost sharing can make programs viable even if they fail social efficiency tests at full coverage.

Keywords:
cost-effectivenesscost-sharinginsurance

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Policy Analysis
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Traditional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) guides health program implementation based on a maximum acceptable cost per unit of effectiveness.
  • Policy implications typically dictate full insurance coverage for programs meeting the CEA threshold and rejection otherwise.
  • The existing framework does not adequately address scenarios involving insurance cost sharing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the appropriate methodology for conducting and interpreting CEA when health insurance involves cost sharing.
  • To determine the optimal relationship between cost-sharing levels and a program's cost-effectiveness ratio.
  • To explore how combining individual and social preferences influences program selection and cost-sharing extent.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical examination of CEA models under cost-sharing conditions.
  • Analysis of the impact of heterogeneous marginal effectiveness of care, known to demanders but not planners.
  • Modeling the interplay between social efficiency criteria and individual preferences in decision-making.

Main Results:

  • The common assumption that cost sharing should inversely correlate with program cost-effectiveness is demonstrated to be flawed.
  • Heterogeneity in perceived marginal effectiveness is a critical factor in CEA under cost sharing.
  • Programs failing social efficiency tests at full coverage may become acceptable with appropriate cost sharing.

Conclusions:

  • Cost-sharing introduces complexities to CEA, necessitating a revised analytical approach.
  • Incorporating individual preferences alongside social efficiency is crucial for optimal health program selection and cost-sharing design.
  • The findings challenge conventional CEA interpretations and offer a more nuanced framework for health policy decisions.