Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Deficient Pms2, ERCC1, Ku86, CcOI in Field Defects During Progression to Colon Cancer
Published on: July 28, 2010
Advanced proximal neoplasia of the colon in average-risk adults
Linda Rabeneck1, Lawrence F Paszat2, Robert J Hilsden3
1Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
Estimating risk for advanced proximal neoplasia (APN) based on distal colon findings can help identify asymptomatic persons who should undergo examination of the proximal colon after flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening.
Objective:
We aimed to determine the risk of APN by most advanced distal finding among an average-risk screening population.
Design:
Prospective, cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Teaching hospital and colorectal cancer screening center.
Patients:
A total of 4651 asymptomatic persons at average risk for colorectal cancer aged 50 to 74 years (54.4% women [n = 2529] with a mean [± standard deviation] age of 58.4 ± 6.2 years).
Interventions:
All participants underwent a complete colonoscopy, including endoscopic removal of all polyps.
Main Outcome Measurements:
We explored associations between several risk factors and APN. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of APN.
Results:
A total of 142 persons (3.1%) had APN, of whom 85 (1.8%) had isolated APN (with no distal findings). APN was associated with older age, a BMI >27 kg/m(2), smoking, distal advanced adenoma and/or cancer, and distal non-advanced tubular adenoma. Those with a distal advanced neoplasm were more than twice as likely to have APN compared with those without distal lesions.
Limitations:
Distal findings used to estimate risk of APN were derived from colonoscopy rather than FS itself.
Conclusion:
In persons at average risk for colorectal cancer, the prevalence of isolated APN was low (1.8%). Use of distal findings to predict APN may not be the most effective strategy. However, incorporating factors such as age (>65 years), sex, BMI (>27 kg/m(2)), and smoking status, in addition to distal findings, should be considered for tailoring colonoscopy recommendations. Further evaluation of risk stratification approaches in other asymptomatic screening populations is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Diverticular Disease of the Colon
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cellular Adaptation IV: Dysplasia and Metaplasia
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...

