Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

974
974
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

12.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
12.5K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

2.9K
2.9K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

1.1K
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
1.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

93.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
93.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active Sensing Subserves Task-Level Control.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Using social media listening to understand barriers to genomic medicine for those living with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and hypermobility spectrum disorders.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2023
Same author

Staged HIV transmission and treatment in a dynamic model with long-term partnerships.

Journal of mathematical biology·2023
Same author

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptance Among Individuals With Cancer, Autoimmune Diseases, or Other Serious Comorbid Conditions: Cross-sectional, Internet-Based Survey.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2021
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Online Communications on Statins, Memory, and Cognition: Qualitative Analysis Using Online Communities.

Journal of medical Internet research·2019
Same author

Wound Versus Foot Care: Is There a Difference?

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

16.1K

Do adults make scale errors too? How function sometimes trumps size.

Krista Casler1, Kathleen Hoffman1, Angelica Eshleman1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|April 2, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adults exhibit "scale errors," choosing tools based on purpose over size, similar to young children. This demonstrates the powerful influence of teleofunctional reasoning in mature cognition.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

8.7K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

16.1K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

8.7K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Scale errors, the misuse of objects due to incorrect size perception, were previously believed to be exclusive to young children.
  • This phenomenon involves selecting an item based on its intended function rather than its actual suitability for a task.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the presence and nature of scale errors in adult cognition.
  • To determine if teleofunctional reasoning influences adult behavior in object selection tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1: Adults selected tools for instrumental goals, with options varying in size appropriateness.
  • Study 2: Controlled for shape bias as a confounding factor in tool selection.
  • Study 3: Replicated findings using a reaching task to assess object interaction.

Main Results:

  • Adults frequently chose tools based on their intended purpose, even when the size was clearly inappropriate for the task.
  • This tendency was not explained by a shape bias.
  • The results were consistent across both selection and reaching tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Teleofunctional (purpose-based) reasoning is a significant factor in categorization and behavior across all developmental stages.
  • Scale errors in adults suggest this type of reasoning is a fundamental aspect of mature cognition, not just immature thinking.