Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
[Investigation of antibacterial activity of topical antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
Shengyong Cui1, Lizhong Han1, Shuzhen Xiao1
1Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Objective:
To investigate the antibacterial activity of silver sulfadiazine (SD-Ag), mupirocin, and clotrimazole used alone or in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from burn wounds.
Methods:
Eighteen MRSA isolates from wound excretion of 18 burn patients hospitalized in our unit from July to December 2011 were collected continuously and non-repetitively. (1) Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 50% MIC (MIC50), and 90% MIC (MIC90) of SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole used alone, those of SD-Ag and mupirocin used in combination, and those of SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole used in combination to MRSA were determined by checkerboard agar dilution method. (2) Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was calculated to determine the combined effect of SD-Ag plus mupirocin, and SD-Ag plus mupirocin and clotrimazole. Synergy with FIC index less than or equal to 0.5 or additivity with FIC index more than 0.5 and less than or equal to 1.0 was regarded as effective, and indifference with FIC index more than 1.0 and less than or equal to 4.0 or antagonism with FIC index more than 4.0 was regarded as ineffective. The effective ratio was compared with overall ratio (assumed as 0) by unilateral binomial distribution test.
Results:
The MIC, MIC50, and MIC90 of SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole used alone against 18 MRSA isolates were respectively 8, 8, 16 µg/mL; 2, 16, 64 µg/mL; 2, 2, 2 µg/mL. MIC of antimicrobial agents used in combination decreased from 3.1% to 50.0% as compared with that of individual agent used alone. Compared with those of single application of SD-Ag and mupirocin, MIC50 of SD-Ag and that of mupirocin both decreased 75.0%, and MIC90 of them decreased 87.5% when SD-Ag and mupirocin were used in combination. Compared with those of single application of SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole, MIC50 of SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole respectively decreased 75.0%, 87.5%, and 50.0%; MIC90 of them respectively decreased 87.5%, 96.9%, and 50.0% when SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole were used in combination. Among the 18 MRSA isolates, the combined effect of SD-Ag and mupirocin was synergic in 9 isolates, additive in 7 isolates, indifferent in 2 isolates, and antagonistic in 0 isolate; the combined effect of SD-Ag, mupirocin, and clotrimazole was additive in 16 isolates, indifferent in 2 isolates, and antagonistic in 0 isolate. There were statistically significant differences between effective ratio and overall ratio of 18 MRSA isolates treated with combined antimicrobial agents (P values all above 0.01).
Conclusions:
For burn wounds at middle and late stages infected with Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus aureus and Fungus, low dose of SD-Ag or combination of above-mentioned antimicrobial agents can effectively control infection and decrease the adverse effect of antimicrobial agents on wound healing.
Insights
Combinations of silver sulfadiazine (SD-Ag), mupirocin, and clotrimazole show significant antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in burn wound infections. These antimicrobial combinations effectively control MRSA and reduce potential adverse effects on wound healing.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Pharmacology
- Dermatology
Context:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant threat in burn wound infections.
- Standard antimicrobial treatments may face challenges due to emerging resistance.
- Evaluating combination therapies is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose:
- To assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of silver sulfadiazine (SD-Ag), mupirocin, and clotrimazole, individually and in combination, against MRSA isolated from burn wounds.
- To determine the synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects of these antimicrobial combinations using checkerboard agar dilution and FIC index methods.
Summary:
- Individual agents showed varying Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) against 18 MRSA isolates.
- Combination therapies significantly reduced MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to single agents.
- Silver sulfadiazine plus mupirocin demonstrated synergistic or additive effects in most isolates, while the triple combination was predominantly additive.
Impact:
- Combined antimicrobial agents can effectively control MRSA infections in burn wounds.
- Low-dose or combination therapies may mitigate adverse effects on wound healing.
- Findings support the strategic use of antimicrobial combinations for managing complex burn wound infections.
More Related Videos
11:52Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surfaces In Vitro
Published on: April 21, 2023
06:36Improved Enzyme Protection Assay to Study Staphylococcus aureus Internalization and Intracellular Efficacy of Antimicrobial Compounds
Published on: September 8, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Antimicrobial Effectiveness