Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

A Mouse Model to Assess Innate Immune Response to Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Published on: February 28, 2019
The evaluation of nasal mupirocin to prevent Staphylococcus aureus burn wound colonization in routine clinical
M E H Jaspers1, R S Breederveld2, W E Tuinebreijer1
1Burn Center, Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Background:
Staphylococcus aureus wound colonization frequently occurs in patients with burns and can cause impaired wound healing. Nasal mupirocin application may contribute to the reduction of burn wound colonization of endogenous origin, whereas colonization by the exogenous route can be reduced by blocking cross-infection from other sources. In this study we evaluated whether the implementation of routine treatment of patients and burn center personnel using nasal mupirocin ointment reduces S. aureus burn wound colonization.
Methods:
We composed three study groups, consisting of a control period (Control), a mupirocin period (MUP), in which patients with burns were all receiving nasal mupirocin at admission, and a mupirocin+personnel period (MUP+P), in which we also screened the burn center personnel and decolonized S. aureus carriers by nasal mupirocin.
Results:
The patients who carried S. aureus in their nose and did not have S. aureus burn wound colonization at admission were considered as patients susceptible for the use of nasal mupirocin. In these patients, the S. aureus burn wound colonization rate was the same in all study groups. S. aureus nasal carriage was a significant independent risk factor for burn wound colonization (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.4-7.6) when analyzed within the three study groups.
Conclusion:
Although S. aureus carriage is a significant risk factor for developing burn wound colonization, the routine use of nasal mupirocin did not contribute to a reduction of burn wound colonization.
Insights
Routine nasal mupirocin application did not reduce Staphylococcus aureus burn wound colonization. However, S. aureus nasal carriage remains a significant risk factor for developing burn wound infections.
Area of Science:
- Infection Control
- Burn Care
- Microbiology
Background:
- Staphylococcus aureus colonization is common in burn patients, leading to impaired wound healing.
- Nasal mupirocin may reduce endogenous S. aureus colonization, while blocking exogenous routes can prevent cross-infection.
- This study investigates the efficacy of routine nasal mupirocin in reducing S. aureus burn wound colonization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of routine nasal mupirocin application in patients and personnel for reducing S. aureus burn wound colonization.
- To determine if S. aureus nasal carriage is a risk factor for burn wound colonization.
Main Methods:
- Three study groups were established: Control, Mupirocin (patients treated), and Mupirocin+Personnel (patients and staff treated).
- Nasal mupirocin was administered to patients upon admission and to personnel identified as S. aureus carriers.
- Patients with nasal S. aureus but no wound colonization were analyzed for susceptibility to mupirocin treatment.
Main Results:
- The S. aureus burn wound colonization rate was consistent across all study groups for susceptible patients.
- Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage was identified as a significant independent risk factor for burn wound colonization (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.4-7.6).
Conclusions:
- Despite S. aureus nasal carriage being a significant risk factor, routine nasal mupirocin did not effectively reduce burn wound colonization.
- Further strategies may be needed to mitigate S. aureus colonization in burn wound settings.
More Related Videos
07:32Evaluating the Immune Response of a Nanoemulsion Adjuvant Vaccine Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Infection
Published on: September 1, 2023
06:36Improved Enzyme Protection Assay to Study Staphylococcus aureus Internalization and Intracellular Efficacy of Antimicrobial Compounds
Published on: September 8, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance