Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

12:32
Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans
Published on: September 27, 2020
9.3K
Postmortem CT compared to autopsy in children; concordance in a forensic setting
Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn1, Vidija Soerdjbalie-Maikoe, Henri de Bakker
1Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, Netherlands, t.sieswerda@amc.nl.
International Journal of Legal Medicine
|April 2, 2014
Summary
Postmortem CT (PMCT) accurately identifies most unnatural childhood deaths but struggles with natural causes. This imaging technique is not a substitute for autopsy when the cause of death is unclear.
Area of Science:
- Forensic pathology
- Medical imaging
- Pediatric medicine
Background:
- Forensic autopsies are crucial for determining the cause of death in suspected non-natural fatalities.
- Postmortem CT (PMCT) is increasingly used as a complementary tool in forensic investigations.
- Assessing the accuracy of PMCT in pediatric cases is essential for its effective application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PMCT in identifying the cause of death in children.
- To compare PMCT findings with autopsy results in pediatric forensic cases.
- To determine the concordance between PMCT and autopsy for natural versus unnatural causes of death.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of pediatric forensic autopsies with available PMCT data.
- Independent cause of death scoring by a radiologist and a pathologist.
- Classification of cause of death using ICD-10 and institutional categories.
Main Results:
- Of 174 autopsies, 98 underwent PMCT; concordance with autopsy was 70% for cause category and 67-72% for specific cause.
- PMCT showed higher agreement in unnatural deaths (59-67%) compared to natural deaths (0%).
- PMCT failed to identify a cause of death in 98% of cases where autopsy also found no cause.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric PMCT is effective in identifying the majority of unnatural causes of death.
- PMCT does not provide new diagnoses when autopsy reveals no cause of death.
- The diagnostic accuracy of PMCT for natural deaths is limited.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
7.6K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
7.6K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
671
Cardiac computed tomography (CT) scanning is an advanced cardiac imaging technique that utilizes CT technology, with or without intravenous (IV) contrast, to produce accurate cross-sectional virtual slices of specific areas of the heart, coronary circulation, and major blood vessels such as the aorta, pulmonary veins, and arteries. The computer processes these slices to generate three-dimensional images. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is a rapid form of CT scanning that captures multiple slices...
671
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.4K

