Item reliability of the Milani-Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test

W A Stuberg1, P J White, J A Miedaner

  • 1C Louis Meyer Children's Rehabilitation Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68105.

Physical Therapy
|May 1, 1989
PubMed

Insights

The Milani-Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test shows acceptable interobserver and test-retest reliability for children aged 1-16 months. Further evaluation is needed for its use in predicting or monitoring developmental delays.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric physical therapy
  • Developmental pediatrics
  • Motor development assessment

Background:

  • Reliability of developmental screening tools is crucial for accurate clinical assessment.
  • The Milani-Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test is used to evaluate motor skills in young children.
  • Establishing the psychometric properties of screening tests ensures their validity and utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the interobserver and test-retest reliability of the Milani-Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test.
  • To determine the consistency of scoring by different examiners and over time.
  • To provide evidence for the clinical utility of this motor development screening tool.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty healthy children aged 1-16 months were videotaped during the Milani-Comparetti test administration.
  • Four pediatric physical therapists independently scored the videotaped responses to assess interobserver reliability.
  • Forty-three children were retested within one week to evaluate test-retest reliability using percentage agreement and Kappa statistics.

Main Results:

  • Interobserver agreement ranged from 79% to 98%, with significant G statistics for all items.
  • Test-retest agreement ranged from 80% to 100%.
  • Excellent test-retest reliability (Kappa > 0.75) was found for 82% of items, with good reliability for the rest.

Conclusions:

  • The Milani-Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test demonstrates acceptable interobserver and test-retest reliability for the assessed age group.
  • The findings support the use of the test as a reliable screening tool for motor development.
  • Further research is recommended to evaluate its predictive and follow-up capabilities in at-risk populations.

Related Concept Videos