Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Controlling Parkinson's Disease With Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: July 16, 2014
Coordinate-based lead location does not predict Parkinson's disease deep brain stimulation outcome
Kelsey A Nestor1, Jacob D Jones2, Christopher R Butson3
1Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead coordinates do not reliably predict Parkinson's disease (PD) motor outcomes. Individual neuroanatomical differences mean simple location measurements are insufficient for optimizing DBS therapy.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD).
- Effective target regions for DBS in PD are known, but predicting outcomes based on lead placement is complex.
- Individual neuroanatomical variations may limit the predictability of simple coordinate-based lead localization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if Cartesian coordinates of implanted DBS leads predict motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease patients.
- To test the hypothesis that lead position and trajectory relative to the mid-commissural point (MCP) significantly correlate with clinical outcomes.
- To evaluate the reliability of standard lead localization methods in the context of individual patient anatomy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 55 subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and 41 globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS patient cohorts.
- Measurement of lead locations in AC-PC space (x, y, z coordinates, entry angles) using CT-MRI fused images.
- Correlation analysis between coordinate-based lead locations and motor outcomes assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).
Main Results:
- Coordinate-based lead locations were not significant predictors of UPDRS III motor score improvement.
- A statistical trend suggested that more anterior GPi lead locations correlated with worse motor outcomes (p<0.082).
- Simple positional measurements of DBS leads did not significantly correlate with motor improvements.
Conclusions:
- Standard DBS lead position relative to the MCP does not reliably predict motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease.
- The lack of correlation is likely due to failure to account for individual neuroanatomical variability.
- More sophisticated methods are needed to precisely identify stimulation locations relative to specific anatomical targets for improved DBS efficacy.
More Related Videos
07:14A Novel Approach to Assess Motor Outcome of Deep Brain Stimulation Effects in the Hemiparkinsonian Rat: Staircase and Cylinder Test
Published on: May 31, 2016
14:14Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
Published on: August 12, 2018