Erroneous identification of APOBEC3-edited chromosomal DNA in cancer genomics

R Suspène1, V Caval1, M Henry1

  • 1Molecular Retrovirology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris, France.

Abstract

Insights

Differential DNA denaturation PCR (3D PCR) introduces artifacts, generating false C->T and G->A mutations. This technique is unsuitable for identifying true cancer genome mutations.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Cancer genomics reveals CG->TA transitions as dominant mutations, likely caused by APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases.
  • APOBEC3A can access nuclear DNA, introducing numerous C->T mutations in a 5'TpC context, which are copied as G->A in a 5'GpA context.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the error rate of differential DNA denaturation PCR (3D PCR) for analyzing APOBEC3-edited DNA.
  • To determine if 3D PCR can accurately identify C->T transitions in cancer genomes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 3D PCR, a technique exploiting A+T richness in APOBEC3-edited DNA for recovery.
  • Investigated 3D PCR errors using cloned DNA and compared results with standard PCR.

Main Results:

  • 3D PCR exhibits a higher error rate than standard PCR.
  • The technique generates DNA strands with both C->T and G->A mutations in a 5'GpCpR context, mimicking cancer mutations.
  • Similar mutation patterns were observed in human tumor DNA analyzed via 3D PCR.

Conclusions:

  • 3D PCR is not a reliable method for identifying fixed C->T transitions in cancer genomes due to significant artifact generation.
  • The high error rate of 3D PCR (4-20 kb(-1)) surpasses the mutation frequency in cancer genomes, leading to artefactual findings.
  • Sequences with mixed C->T and G->A mutations recovered by 3D PCR in a 5'GpC context are considered artefacts.