Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
First-, second-, third-line therapy for mRCC: benchmarks for trial design from the IMDC
J J Ko1, T K Choueiri2, B I Rini3
1Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Background:
Limited data exist on outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with multiple lines of therapy. Benchmarks for survival are required for patient counselling and clinical trial design.
Methods:
Outcomes of mRCC patients from the International mRCC Database Consortium database treated with 1, 2, or 3+ lines of targeted therapy (TT) were compared by proportional hazards regression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using different population inclusion criteria.
Results:
In total, 2705 patients were treated with TT of which 57% received only first-line TT, 27% received two lines of TT, and 16% received 3+ lines of TT. Overall survival of patients who received 1, 2, or 3+ lines of TT were 14.9, 21.0, and 39.2 months, respectively, from first-line TT (P<0.0001). On multivariable analysis, 2 lines and 3+ lines of therapy were each associated with better OS (HR=0.738 and 0.626, P<0.0001). Survival outcomes for the subgroups were as follows: for all patients, OS 20.9 months and PFS 7.2 months; for those similar to eligible patients in the first-line ADAPT trial, OS 14.7 months and PFS 5.6 months; for those similar to patients in first-line TIVO-1 trial, OS 24.8 months and PFS 8.2 months; for those similar to patients in second-line INTORSECT trial, OS 13.0 months and PFS 3.9 months; and for those similar to patients in the third-line GOLD trial, OS 18.0 months and PFS 4.4 months.
Conclusions:
Patients who are able to receive more lines of TT live longer. Survival benchmarks provide context and perspective when interpreting and designing clinical trials.
Insights
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving multiple lines of targeted therapy (TT) demonstrate significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). These survival benchmarks are crucial for clinical trial design and patient counseling in mRCC.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Research
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Limited data exist on the survival outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients undergoing multiple lines of targeted therapy (TT).
- Establishing survival benchmarks is essential for informed patient counseling and effective clinical trial design in mRCC.
- Previous studies have not comprehensively analyzed outcomes across varying numbers of TT lines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the survival outcomes of mRCC patients treated with one, two, or three or more lines of TT.
- To establish survival benchmarks for mRCC patients receiving sequential TT.
- To provide data for patient counseling and clinical trial design.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the International mRCC Database Consortium database.
- Inclusion of 2705 mRCC patients treated with TT.
- Comparison of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using proportional hazards regression, with subgroup analyses based on trial eligibility criteria.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving 2 lines (21.0 months OS) and 3+ lines (39.2 months OS) of TT showed significantly longer OS compared to those receiving 1 line (14.9 months OS).
- Multivariable analysis confirmed that 2 lines (HR=0.738) and 3+ lines (HR=0.626) of TT were associated with improved OS.
- Overall survival for all patients was 20.9 months and PFS was 7.2 months, with variations across subgroups mirroring specific clinical trial populations.
Conclusions:
- Patients with mRCC who receive multiple lines of TT experience longer survival durations.
- The established survival benchmarks offer valuable context for interpreting clinical trial results and for designing future mRCC therapeutic strategies.
- Sequential targeted therapy demonstrates a survival benefit in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
More Related Videos
06:25Author Spotlight: Assessing the Potential of Circulating Tumor Cells in Leptomeningeal Disease Research
Published on: March 29, 2024
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...