Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
Hyperbaric air exposure at 2.5 ATA does not affect respiratory mechanics and lung histology in the rat
Alessandro Rubini1, Andrea Porzionato, Gloria Sarasin
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section Physiology, University of Padova, Via Marzolo, 3, 35100, Padua, Italy, alessandro.rubini@unipd.it.
Background:
We previously demonstrated that the exposure to hyperbaric hyperoxia increased respiratory system elastance and both the "ohmic" and viscoelastic components of inspiratory resistances, probably because of increased oxygen tension toxic effects. We presently investigated the possible consequences of a single exposure to 2.5-atmospheres absolute air (hyperbarism) lasting 90 min.
Methods:
We used the end-inflation occlusion method on anesthetized rats after about 15 min from previous exposure to hyperbarism. The method allows the measurements of respiratory system elastance and of the ohmic and viscoelastic components of airway resistance, which respectively depend on the Newtonian pressure dissipation due to the ohmic airway resistance to airflow and on the viscoelastic pressure dissipation caused by respiratory system tissue stress relaxation. The expressions of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) in the lung's tissues were also investigated, together with the histological characteristics of lung tissue. Data were compared with those obtained in control animals and in previously studied animals exposed to hyperoxic hyperbarism.
Results:
Unlike with hyperoxic hyperbarism, hyperbarism per se did not change significantly the parameters of respiratory mechanics in the control animals (respiratory system elastance and ohmic and viscoelastic resistances were 2.01 ± 0.17 vs. 1.74 ± 0.08 cm H(2)O/ml, and 0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.13 ± 0.03 and 0.425 ± 0.04 vs. 0.33 ± 0.03 cm H(2)O/ml s(-1) in control vs. experimental animals, respectively, none significantly different), nor did it induce evident effects on lung histology. An increment of both iNOS and eNOS expressions was documented instead (0.50 ± 0.05 vs. 0.75 ± 0.07 and 1.04 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.15, respectively).
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that, at variance with hyperoxic hyperbarism, the acute exposure to only hyperbarism does not affect either the elastic or the resistive respiratory system properties, or lung histology.
