Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.4K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.4K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

4.0K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
4.0K
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

1.6K
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
1.6K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

4.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
4.7K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An outbreak of Salmonella Waycross related to sandpit contamination in a Gold Coast childcare centre, Queensland, Australia, 2024.

Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)·2026
Same author

Fertility Preservation Needs of Men Undergoing Cancer Treatment: An Explorative Qualitative Study.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of plasma pathophysiology biomarkers in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease following lecanemab treatment.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)·2026
Same author

Addressing the Effects of Smoking on Cancer by Increasing National Access to Smoking Cessation Across Canada.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026
Same author

Shigellosis: antibiotics should be strictly reserved for severe disease and cases at very high risk of onward transmission.

Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)·2026
Same author

Brain Amyloid Plaque Levels Affect Clinical Progression in Alzheimer Disease: Assessment of Amyloid PET and Change in CDR-SB Utilizing Semi-Mechanistic Model.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

3.2K

Raising the bar: using program evaluation for quality improvement.

Rebecca Anas, Jennifer Stiff, Brittany Speller

    Healthcare Management Forum
    |April 5, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Cancer Quality Council of Ontario uses programmatic reviews to assess and improve cancer care programs. These quality improvement initiatives involve critical appraisal and environmental scans to guide future directions in cancer services.

    More Related Videos

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
    10:07

    Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

    Published on: June 21, 2010

    20.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 1, 2026

    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
    06:05

    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

    Published on: February 19, 2021

    3.2K
    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
    10:07

    Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

    Published on: June 21, 2010

    20.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Quality Improvement Science
    • Oncology Program Evaluation

    Background:

    • The Cancer Quality Council of Ontario (CQCA) partners with Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) to enhance cancer care.
    • Programmatic reviews are essential for evaluating and refining healthcare services.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate emerging or existing cancer programs.
    • To provide strategic future directions for cancer care initiatives.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducting 3 programmatic reviews.
    • Performing assessments of current program states.
    • Undertaking critical appraisals and environmental scans.

    Main Results:

    • Identification of best practices from various jurisdictions.
    • Facilitation of expert discussions on program enhancement.
    • Development of actionable recommendations for program improvement.

    Conclusions:

    • Programmatic reviews serve as a vital quality improvement tool.
    • These reviews lead to data-driven recommendations for optimizing cancer care delivery.
    • The process fosters continuous improvement in Ontario's cancer programs.