Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Use of a Low-flow Digital Anesthesia System for Mice and Rats
Published on: September 7, 2016
Desflurane concentrations and consumptions during low flow anesthesia
Background:
Desflurane is the least soluble and most expensive inhalation agent. Hence, low flow technique is suitable for anesthesia with desflurane. However, one of the disadvantages of low flow technique is the discrepancy among the end-tidal concentration, inspired concentration, and vaporizer setting.
Objective:
To measure the concentrations of desflurane at different sites of the anesthesia circuit by varying fresh gas flow (FGF) rates but fixing expired concentration.
Material And Method:
Thirty ASA PS I-II adult patients were enrolled in this crossover study. After induction of anesthesia and ten minutes of wash-in period, the flow meters of oxygen and air were then adjusted to maintain FiO2 at 0.3 with the random sequences of FGF rates at 0.5, 1 and 2 L x min(-1). Desflurane vaporizer was adjusted to obtain 5% end-tidal desflurane concentration (FeDES) throughout the study period. After FeDES reached the target and was stable for 20 minutes, inspired concentration ofdesflurane (FiDES) and delivered desflurane concentration at fresh gas outlet (FdDES) were measured. Lastly, the consumption of desflurane was calculated.
Results:
FdDES was higher than FiDES in every FGF rates. FdDES at FGF 0.5 L x min(-1) (6.13 +/- 0.12) was significantly higher than FdDES at 1 and 2 L x min(-1) (5.68 +/- 0.08, 5.54 +/- 0.07, respectively), but not significantly different between FGF 1 and 2 L x min(-1). FeDES/FdDES at FGF 0.5, 1 and 2 L.min(-1) were 0.82 +/- 0.014, 0.88 +/- 0.012 and 0.87 +/- 0.011, respectively. There was no significant difference of FeDES/FdDES between FGF 1 and 2 L x min(-1), but there was significant difference between FGF 1 and 0.5 L x min(-1) with the p-value < 0.001. The calculated liquid desflurane consumption per hour at FGF rate of 0.5, 1 and 2 L x min(-1) were 8.77 +/- 0.17, 16.28 +/- 0.24 and 31.73 +/- 0.41 mL x hr(-1).
Conclusion:
Using FGF 2 L x min(-1) has no advantage over FGF 1 L x min(-2), because they both have the similar FdDES. Regarding at FGF 0.5 and 1 L x min(-1), the delivered concentration has to be increased to obtain the desired expired concentration with more intense at FGF 0.5 L x min(-1) because there are more discrepancies between FdDES and FeDES.
More Related Videos
03:02Application of Dixon's Up-and-Down Design to Estimate the Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Sevoflurane in Rats with Refined Movement Classification
Published on: July 25, 2025
04:56In Vitro Method to Control Concentrations of Halogenated Gases in Cultured Alveolar Epithelial Cells
Published on: October 23, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask
Nasal Cannula
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split at one end into two prongs and placed in the nostrils. It is typically used to deliver low to medium levels of oxygen.
Suggested flow rate: The suggested flow rate for a nasal cannula typically ranges between 1 and 6 L/min.
Oxygen percentage setting:...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...