Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026
Retrospective study of results of Kawashima procedure
Sachin Talwar1, Lokesh Shekher Jaiswal1, Shiv Kumar Choudhary1
1Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Background:
Patients with single ventricle physiology and an interrupted inferior caval vein undergo the Kawashima procedure. With increasing follow-up, pulmonary arteriovenous malformations may develop requiring hepatocardiac venous redirection.
Methods:
Between January 2005 and December 2012, 15 patients underwent the Kawashima procedure. Preoperative and postoperative characteristics along with functional class, intra-operative details, post-operative course, saturations and haematocrit were recorded.
Results:
Median age at operation was five years (range 1- 20 years). Five patients had antegrade pulmonary blood flow interrupted and 10 patients had open antegrade flow. There were no deaths. Mean saturation in postoperative period was 90.8 ±1.36%. Median duration of mechanical ventilation and inotropic support was six and 16hours respectively. Median duration of pleural drainage was six days. Median duration of pleural drainage in antegrade flow open and interrupted group was six days and four days respectively. The mean hospital stay was 10.5 days ±7.1 days. Mean follow up was 40.2 ±31 months (median-30 months). Nine patients (60%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 1 and five patients (33.3%) were in NYHA functional class 2 at last follow-up. Only one patient was in class 3 and needs completion Fontan.
Conclusions:
The Kawashima procedure can be safely performed with acceptable early results. Although studies have shown the risk of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations after Kawashima procedure in the mid and long-term, our findings do not support this. Kawashima procedure with open antegrade pulmonary blood flow as a definite intervention in such patients is debatable.