What is the optimal treatment for obese patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma?

The purpose of this study was to compare primary debulking surgery (PDS) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) among obese patients.

Medical records of patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m(2) with ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal carcinoma between January 2005 and December 2010 were reviewed. Patients were separated by PDS or NACT-IDS. Preoperative characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Of 117 patients, 95 women (81.2%) underwent PDS, and 22 women (18.8%) underwent NACT-IDS. Patients who underwent NACT-IDS were more likely to have stage IV disease (63.6% vs 26.3%; P = .001) and a low surgical complexity score (n = 14; 63.6%). There were no other differences between groups with respect to preoperative characteristics or postoperative morbidity. Compared with the NACT-IDS group, the PDS group had an improved progression-free survival (PFS; 15 vs 11 months; P = .006) and overall survival (OS; 53 vs 32 months; P = .036). Seventy-eight patients (66.7%) had a BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m(2). Within this subset of obese patients, the PDS group had an improved PFS (15 vs 10 months; P = .011) and OS (58 vs 32 months; P = .033), compared with the NACT-IDS group. Among patients with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m(2), there was no difference in PFS (14 vs 12 months; P = .316) or OS (38 vs 32 months; P = .640) when the PDS and NACT-IDS groups were compared.

Patients with a BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m(2) who undergo PDS have improved oncologic outcomes, compared with those women who undergo NACT-IDS. Patients with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m(2) who undergo PDS have similar oncologic outcomes to those who undergo NACT-IDS. Complication rates were similar at all BMIs, regardless of treatment approach.