Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Antiviral System of Bacteria and Archaea: CRISPR01:23

The Antiviral System of Bacteria and Archaea: CRISPR

1.1K
CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats is a adaptive immune system found in bacteria and archaea that protects against viral infections. This system enables prokaryotic cells to identify, remember, and neutralize foreign genetic elements, primarily bacteriophages, by storing fragments of the invader’s DNA as a genetic memory.The CRISPR immune response begins during an initial infection. Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins play a central role in this...
1.1K
CRISPR and crRNAs02:53

CRISPR and crRNAs

14.6K
Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
14.6K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing01:28

CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

3.2K
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
3.2K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

46.4K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
46.4K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

13.9K
13.9K
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

58.8K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
58.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eco-evolutionary feedbacks drive the co-occurrence of restriction-modification systems and antimicrobial resistance genes in bacteria.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Genome scale CRISPRi reveals both shared and strain-specific vulnerabilities in genetically diverse drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Social cues drive the evolution of plastic pathogen virulence in spatially and temporally variable environments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Short-term antagonism between bacteriophages and macrophages decreases with bacteria-phage coevolution.

The ISME journal·2026
Same author

A novel method to simultaneously estimate bacterial respiration and growth from oxygen dynamics.

ISME communications·2026
Same author

Realizing phage therapy in the UK.

Nature microbiology·2026
Same journal

Climate adaptation and biodiversity shape West Nile virus risk in cities.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same journal

Climate factors and evolution drive cholera surges in Dhaka.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same journal

Climate change boosts Salmonella antimicrobial resistance.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same journal

Reframing risk assessment for malaria elimination in a changing climate.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same journal

Bacterial vesicles protect the membrane during polymyxin stress.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same journal

Fermented food microbiome: influence on oral and gut microbiota, and human health.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishing CENP-E Knockout HeLa Cells – A Novel Approach to Study Kinesin-7 CENP-E Biology and its Inhibitors
11:49

Author Spotlight: Establishing CENP-E Knockout HeLa Cells – A Novel Approach to Study Kinesin-7 CENP-E Biology and its Inhibitors

Published on: June 23, 2023

1.4K

CRISPR-Cas systems: beyond adaptive immunity.

Edze R Westra1, Angus Buckling1, Peter C Fineran2

  • 1University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK.

Nature Reviews. Microbiology
|April 8, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article reviews how CRISPR-Cas systems, originally known for protecting bacteria from viruses, also influence other cellular activities like gene regulation, DNA repair, and bacterial virulence. Understanding these diverse roles helps clarify why these systems persist in microbial genomes.

Keywords:
Microbial GenomicsGene RegulationBacterial VirulenceDNA Repair Mechanisms

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
11:53

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems

Published on: September 8, 2012

28.3K
Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishing CENP-E Knockout HeLa Cells – A Novel Approach to Study Kinesin-7 CENP-E Biology and its Inhibitors
11:49

Author Spotlight: Establishing CENP-E Knockout HeLa Cells – A Novel Approach to Study Kinesin-7 CENP-E Biology and its Inhibitors

Published on: June 23, 2023

1.4K
Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
11:53

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems

Published on: September 8, 2012

28.3K
Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology research investigating CRISPR-Cas systems
  • Evolutionary biology and genomics

Background:

No prior work had resolved the full scope of non-immune roles for prokaryotic defense mechanisms. It was already known that these molecular complexes provide protection against invading genetic material. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate whether these proteins influence internal cellular physiology. Prior research has shown that these systems exist widely across diverse microbial species. This gap motivated a deeper look into how these tools affect bacterial survival beyond simple immunity. Many scientists previously assumed these systems functioned exclusively as antiviral barriers. That perspective limited our view of their broader biological impact. This review synthesizes evidence regarding their influence on gene expression and genome stability.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to evaluate the unconventional roles of these systems beyond their established immune functions. This review addresses the growing evidence that these proteins influence internal cellular processes. Researchers seek to clarify how these systems contribute to gene regulation and virulence. The study focuses on the broader biological impact of these molecular complexes in prokaryotic life. This investigation explores the connection between these proteins and genome evolution. The authors intend to synthesize recent findings that challenge the traditional view of these systems. Understanding these diverse activities is necessary to explain why these proteins persist in microbial genomes. This work provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding these multifaceted genetic tools.

Main Methods:

Review approach involves a comprehensive synthesis of recent literature regarding non-canonical protein functions. The authors systematically categorize studies that deviate from traditional immune-based observations. This evaluation focuses on diverse microbial species to identify common regulatory patterns. Investigators utilize bioinformatic tools to compare genomic sequences across various prokaryotic groups. The team examines experimental reports detailing phenotypic changes in mutant bacterial strains. This process highlights consistent evidence linking specific proteins to DNA repair pathways. Experts evaluate the impact of these systems on gene expression through meta-analysis of transcriptomic data. The methodology prioritizes peer-reviewed findings that establish clear connections between these molecular tools and cellular physiology.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature demonstrate that these systems modulate virulence and group behavior in several bacterial species. Evidence indicates that CRISPR-Cas proteins participate in DNA repair, which directly influences genome stability. Studies show that these systems regulate gene expression, affecting how bacteria adapt to environmental stressors. The literature suggests that these functions are distinct from the well-characterized antiviral defense mechanisms. Researchers report that these unconventional activities contribute to the overall evolutionary trajectory of microbial genomes. Data confirm that these proteins are not limited to protecting against mobile genetic elements. The review identifies multiple pathways where these systems influence cellular survival and fitness. Findings reveal that these roles are widespread among diverse prokaryotic populations.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that these unconventional functions shape the long-term persistence of these systems. Synthesis and implications suggest that gene regulation and DNA repair are linked to microbial fitness. Researchers claim that these diverse activities explain why prokaryotes maintain these proteins even without constant viral pressure. The review highlights how virulence modulation might influence host-pathogen interactions. These findings provide a framework for future studies on bacterial adaptation. Authors emphasize that genome evolution is significantly impacted by these non-canonical roles. The evidence suggests that CRISPR-Cas systems act as multifaceted regulators within the cell. This synthesis clarifies the evolutionary drivers behind the maintenance of these complex genetic tools.

The researchers propose that these systems regulate group behavior and virulence by acting as gene expression modulators. Unlike their role in adaptive immunity, which targets foreign DNA, these functions involve direct interaction with endogenous genetic sequences to influence bacterial phenotypes.

The authors identify DNA repair proteins as a key component. While CRISPR-Cas proteins typically cleave viral DNA, these specific variants participate in maintaining genomic integrity by facilitating the repair of damaged host DNA strands during replication.

The authors propose that the presence of mobile genetic elements is necessary to trigger the adaptive immune response. In contrast, the unconventional regulatory functions appear to operate independently of these external threats, allowing the cell to manage internal physiological processes.

The authors utilize comparative genomic data to map the distribution of these systems. This approach allows them to correlate the presence of specific CRISPR-Cas types with the observed regulatory phenotypes across different bacterial lineages.

The researchers measure changes in gene expression profiles to identify these unconventional functions. They observe that the deletion of specific CRISPR-Cas genes leads to significant shifts in virulence-related transcripts, a phenomenon not seen in control groups.

The authors propose that these systems are maintained in prokaryotic genomes because they provide a fitness advantage beyond immunity. They argue that the regulation of group behavior and genome evolution makes these systems beneficial even in environments lacking viral threats.