Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

07:50
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Murine Brown Adipose Tissue
Published on: November 21, 2018
7.7K
Thrice better than once: quality control guidelines to validate new mitogenomes
Fidel Botero-Castro1, Frédéric Delsuc1, Emmanuel J P Douzery1
1a Université Montpellier 2, CNRS & IRD, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554) , Montpellier , France.
Summary
A bat mitochondrial genome sequence was misidentified. Phylogenetic analysis revealed it belongs to a known species, highlighting the need for rigorous DNA sequence verification in evolutionary studies.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Mitogenomic data are crucial for evolutionary biology and ecology.
- Accurate DNA sequence authentication is essential for reliable research.
- Previous studies have highlighted the importance of verifying sequence data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the taxonomic attribution of a recently published bat mitochondrial genome.
- To demonstrate the utility of phylogenetic analyses in identifying misidentified sequences.
- To propose standards for publishing mitogenomic data to prevent future errors.
Main Methods:
- Phylogenetic analyses of available chiropteran sequence data.
- Comparison of the suspect mitogenome with existing reference sequences.
- Construction of maximum likelihood trees using standard barcoding markers and related mitogenomes.
Main Results:
- The mitochondrial genome reported by Szcześniak et al. (2013) for Rousettus leschenaultii was found to be misidentified.
- Phylogenetic analyses strongly suggest the sequence belongs to Rousettus aegyptiacus.
- A reference sequence for R. aegyptiacus already exists in public databases.
Conclusions:
- Future publications of complete mitochondrial genomes should include robust phylogenetic analyses.
- Mandatory inclusion of maximum likelihood trees and phylograms is recommended.
- Standardized reporting of geographical origin and specimen details will improve data authenticity.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
11.5K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
11.5K
In vitro Mutagenesis
4.9K
4.9K
In-vitro Mutagenesis
14.8K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
14.8K

