Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliations in bullying roles
Amanda B Nickerson1, Danielle Mele-Taylor2
1Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Abstract:
In this study, the relationships among gender, empathetic responsiveness, perceived group norms, prosocial affiliations, and bullying roles were examined for 262 fifth- through eighth-grade students (n = 141 males; n = 121 females). According to the Bullying Participant Roles Survey (BPRS), participants were identified as defenders (n = 135; 51.5%), victims (n = 48; 18.3%), bullies (n = 39; 14.9%), and outsiders (n = 26; 9.9%). Results of multinominal logistic regression revealed that empathetic responsiveness was a significant predictor of defending behavior and an inverse predictor of outsider behavior. Gender also predicted defending behavior, with boys being more likely to defend than girls. In addition, participants who indicated that their friends supported bullying were more likely to be involved in bullying perpetration and victimization. An unexpected interaction effect between prosocial affiliations and group norms indicated that girls who reported more probullying group norms but whose friends reported having more prosocial tendencies were more likely to assume roles of bullies and victims than outsiders. Implications for practice are outlined, including recommendations for antibullying initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Empathy
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
Impact of Groups on Individuals
The Stanford Prison Experiment

