Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Interaural Time and Level Differences Contribute Differently to Source Segregation and Spatial Selection.

Trends in hearing·2026

Same author

Measurement prediction and power analysis for fNIRS and DOT.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Development of Narrative Abilities in (Re)telling a Story in Typically Developing Dutch School-Aged Children.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

Same author

Effects of Task-Irrelevant Talker Identity and Continuity on Spatial Selective Attention Under Interruption.

Trends in hearing·2026

Same author

A Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Motivation on Autonomic Cardiorespiratory Activity in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Same author

Prediction from Statistical Learning Aids Auditory Scene Analysis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing.

Thomas Koelewijn¹, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham², Adriana A Zekveld³

¹Section Audiology, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Hearing Research

|April 9, 2014

Summary

Dividing attention to process two speech streams significantly impairs performance and increases cognitive load. Pupillometry revealed larger pupil dilation and delayed peak latency when attention was divided, indicating higher processing demands.

More Related Videos

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Neuroscience
Auditory perception

Background:

Dividing attention between two speech streams significantly reduces performance compared to single-stream processing.
The impact of divided attention on cognitive processing load during speech recognition, specifically using pupillometry, remains under-investigated.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how divided attention affects cognitive processing load during speech recognition.
To examine pupil responses as an index of cognitive load in a dual-stream speech processing task.

Main Methods:

Pupil response was recorded in 12 young adults under conditions of focusing on one versus two dichotically presented speech sentences.
Speech stimuli were masked by fluctuating noise across various signal-to-noise ratios.
Performance accuracy and pupil dilation/latency were measured.

Main Results:

Performance decreased significantly when participants processed two target sentences simultaneously compared to one.
Dividing attention to process two sentences resulted in larger pupil dilation and later peak pupil latency.
These pupillometry findings suggest increased cognitive processing load when attention is divided.

Conclusions:

Dividing attention during speech recognition in noise increases cognitive processing load.
Pupillometry, specifically pupil dilation and latency, serves as a valid indicator of cognitive load in auditory attention tasks.
Findings highlight the neural and physiological costs associated with attentional resource allocation in complex listening environments.