Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

16:08
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
Published on: February 1, 2012
15.5K
Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming
Michele T Diaz1, Larson J Hogstrom2, Jie Zhuang2
1Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, School of Medicine, Duke University Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|April 10, 2014
Summary
Investigating semantic effects on language production, this study found that phonological distractors activate language processing areas differently than semantic distractors. Semantic distractors showed similar brain activation patterns, suggesting shared processing demands.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psycholinguistics
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Language production involves sequential processing stages, including semantic and lexical access.
- Distractor words during picture naming reveal insights into language production mechanisms.
- Different semantic relationships (phonological, categorical, part-whole) yield varied effects on naming speed and accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different types of semantic distractors influence brain activation during picture naming.
- To compare the neural correlates of phonological versus semantic distractor effects in language production.
- To elucidate the role of semantic relation type in lexical competition and concept retrieval.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity.
- Participants performed overt picture naming tasks while presented with written distractors.
- Four distractor types were used: phonologically-related, categorically-related, part-whole, and unrelated.
Main Results:
- Phonologically-related distractors showed greater activation in the left insula and bilateral parietal cortex compared to semantic distractors.
- Semantic conditions (categorical and part-whole) elicited greater activation in the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (MTG) than phonological distractors.
- The two semantic conditions did not show significant differences in brain activation, suggesting similar processing demands.
Conclusions:
- Phonological and semantic distractors engage distinct neural networks during language production.
- The left posterior MTG is crucial for concept retrieval and semantic integration, as indicated by semantic distractor effects.
- Semantic distractors, regardless of their specific relation (categorical or part-whole), appear to rely on shared semantic processing resources.

