Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

78.8K
Overview
78.8K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

13.8K
13.8K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

215.1K
Overview
215.1K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

61.3K
Overview
61.3K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

19.0K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
19.0K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

58.0K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
58.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case of complete response to immunotherapy in MMR-deficient prostate cancer associated with NK-like and CD4<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Variant Prioritization by Pedigree-Based Haplotyping.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same author

Estradiol enhances influenza vaccine responses through B cell metabolic reprogramming in female mice.

mBio·2026
Same author

Multiple-testing corrections in case-control studies using identity-by-descent segments.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

A common 19 bp APOE enhancer deletion is protective against Alzheimer's disease in African Americans.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Mechanisms of sex differences in acute and long COVID sequelae in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K

Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.

Charles Y K Cheung1, Elizabeth A Thompson, Ellen M Wijsman

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Genetic Epidemiology
|April 11, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an efficient method to detect Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in large pedigrees using dense genetic variants. The new approach significantly improves the accuracy of genetic analysis by minimizing false findings.

Keywords:
computer programdata cleaningexomegenome scanhigh-throughput

More Related Videos

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

7.3K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K
Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

7.3K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genotyping errors can lead to false results in genetic analysis, particularly with high-throughput sequencing data.
  • Existing methods for detecting genotyping errors in pedigrees primarily focus on Mendelian inconsistencies or sparse markers.
  • There is a need for efficient methods to detect Mendelian consistent genotyping errors, especially for dense variants in large pedigrees.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate an efficient method for detecting Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in large pedigrees with dense genetic variants.
  • To assess the method's effectiveness across various parameters, including marker density, error rates, and allele frequencies.

Main Methods:

  • The method involves sampling inheritance vectors using a Markov chain Monte Carlo-based sampler with a sparse set of informative markers.
  • Two test statistics, percentage of inconsistent inheritance vectors (A1) and posterior probability of error configurations (A2), were used to detect Mendelian consistent errors.
  • Simulations were conducted to evaluate the method's performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method, even with the simpler A1 statistic, effectively detects Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in dense variants.
  • The method achieves high sensitivity, approaching the theoretical best possible.
  • Performance was evaluated concerning genotype patterns, marker density, error rates, allele frequencies, and the number of sampled inheritance vectors.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method provides an effective way to detect Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in large pedigrees with dense variants.
  • This approach serves as a crucial tool to mitigate false findings in genetic analyses utilizing dense genetic data.
  • The study highlights the method's robustness and its potential to enhance the reliability of genetic studies.