Direct stenting is an independent predictor of improved survival in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Liam M McCormick1, Adam J Brown1, Liam S Ring1
1Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital, UK.
Insights
Direct stenting (DS) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) significantly reduces 30-day and one-year mortality compared to predilatation (PD) stenting. This improved survival is independent of other interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Previous randomized trials indicated direct stenting (DS) improves reperfusion markers in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Limited data exist on the long-term clinical outcome impact of DS versus predilatation (PD) stenting in STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of DS on mortality in a contemporary, unselected STEMI population undergoing PPCI.
- To compare the long-term survival rates between DS and PD stenting strategies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1562 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI at two UK centers (September 2008 - December 2010).
- Data collected on patient demographics, PPCI strategy (DS vs. PD, manual thrombus aspiration, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors).
- In-hospital, 30-day, and one-year mortality assessed using national databases; multivariate logistic analysis performed for one-year survival.
Main Results:
- Direct stenting (DS) was used in 31.3% of patients (n=489); predilatation (PD) in 68.7% (n=1073).
- DS group showed significantly lower 30-day (2.04% vs. 4.66%, p=0.01) and one-year mortality (3.27% vs. 8.48%, p=0.0001).
- After multivariate adjustment, PD remained an independent predictor of one-year mortality (OR 2.42, p=0.032); neither glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors nor manual thrombus aspiration improved survival.
Conclusions:
- In contemporary STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, direct stenting (DS) is independently associated with improved 30-day and one-year survival compared to stenting after predilatation (PD).
- The findings support the adoption of DS as a preferred strategy in PPCI for STEMI to enhance long-term patient outcomes.
Aims:
Randomised trials have shown that direct stenting (DS) is associated with improved markers of reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, data evaluating its impact on long-term clinical outcomes are lacking. We set out to evaluate the effect of DS on mortality in a contemporary population of patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI.
Methods:
Consecutive patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI at two high-volume UK heart attack centres between September 2008- December 2010 (n=1562) were included in the analysis. Local databases were analysed for patient demographics, as well as details on PPCI strategy, including use of DS versus predilatation (PD) followed by stenting, manual thrombus aspiration (MT) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). National databases were interrogated for in-hospital, 30-day and one-year mortality. To determine the impact of PPCI strategy on one-year survival, multivariate logistic analysis was performed.
Results:
Altogether 489 patients underwent DS (31.3%) and 1073 (68.7%) received PD prior to stenting. Patients receiving DS had reduced mortality at 30 days (2.04 versus 4.66%, p=0.01) and one year (3.27 versus 8.48%, p=0.0001). After multivariate adjustment, PD remained an independent predictor of one-year mortality (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.08-5.45, p=0.032) along with age, cardiogenic shock, number of diseased vessels, and left main or proximal left anterior descending artery intervention. However, neither GPI use nor MT improved survival in either univariate or multivariate analyses.
Conclusions:
In a contemporary, unselected population of patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI, DS - when compared with stenting after PD - is independently predictive of improved 30-day and one-year survival.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies