Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

22.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
22.4K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.8K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.9K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.7K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

1.2K
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
1.2K
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

9.5K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Separating Snap from Tingle: Ultrasound-Guided Diagnosis of a Snapping Brachialis in the Elbow.

Current sports medicine reports·2025
Same author

Diagnosis and management of acute erythroid leukemia (AEL).

Leukemia & lymphoma·2025
Same author

Bing-Neel syndrome: a case series of 46 patients from the United Kingdom.

Blood advances·2025
Same author

Diagnosis and treatment of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

British journal of haematology·2025
Same author

Clonal evolution and the risk of secondary myeloid neoplasia following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Haematologica·2025
Same author

Diagnosis and treatment of T/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukaemia (T/M-MPAL).

EJHaem·2025
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K

Against anonymity.

Robert Baker

    Bioethics
    |April 15, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Anonymous publication of controversial articles, while proposed to protect academic freedom, risks scholarly discourse. Reintroducing anonymity may lead to issues like hate speech and masked conflicts of interest.

    Keywords:
    InternetNazi medicineabortionafter-birth abortionanonymous authorshipdisabilityeugenicsinfanticidepublication ethics

    More Related Videos

    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
    06:58

    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

    Published on: February 7, 2025

    1.3K
    Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
    08:53

    Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

    Published on: May 31, 2019

    5.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 1, 2026

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
    10:26

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

    Published on: September 11, 2021

    3.1K
    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
    06:58

    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

    Published on: February 7, 2025

    1.3K
    Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
    08:53

    Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

    Published on: May 31, 2019

    5.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Science
    • Scholarly Communication

    Background:

    • Francesca Minerva argues anonymity is crucial for academic freedom in the digital age.
    • The debate is fueled by the reaction to the article 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'
    • Minerva proposes anonymous publication for controversial articles.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the history and implications of anonymous publication.
    • To evaluate Minerva's proposal for anonymous publication in the internet era.
    • To argue against the reintroduction of anonymity for controversial scholarly works.

    Main Methods:

    • Historical review of anonymous publication practices in print journals.
    • Critical analysis of Minerva's argument and the events surrounding 'After-birth abortion'.
    • Examination of potential negative consequences of anonymous online publication.

    Main Results:

    • Historical precedent shows anonymity led to corruption of scholarly discourse.
    • Reintroducing anonymity risks issues like hate speech, masked conflicts of interest, and reduced editorial accountability.
    • The hostile reactions to 'After-birth abortion' may be misinterpreted.

    Conclusions:

    • Anonymity is not a prerequisite for academic freedom and poses significant risks to scholarly integrity.
    • Ethicists publishing controversial work should engage with critics, regardless of the nature of the critique.
    • Dialogue and accountability are essential for healthy academic discourse, even with challenging content.