Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

782
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
782
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

516
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
516
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

922
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
922
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

1.3K
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
1.3K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

19.1K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
19.1K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

13.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why did the human brain size evolve? A way forward.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Evolutionary-developmental (evo-devo) dynamics of hominin brain size.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

A mathematical framework for evo-devo dynamics.

Theoretical population biology·2023
Same author

How development affects evolution.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2023
Same author

Eusociality through conflict dissolution.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2021
Same author

Author Correction: Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution.

Nature·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

An evolutionary resolution of manipulation conflict.

Mauricio González-Forero1

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996-1610; National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996-3410. mgonzal7@utk.edu.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|April 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Social manipulation can evolve into mutually beneficial behaviors. Mathematical models show that resistance to manipulation can paradoxically increase its efficiency, resolving conflict over time.

Keywords:
Altruismarms racecooperationsocial behavior

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

6.8K
A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster
07:19

A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 30, 2015

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

6.8K
A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster
07:19

A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 30, 2015

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Behavioral ecology
  • Game theory

Background:

  • Social manipulation occurs when individuals alter the behavior of others.
  • Such manipulation can create conflicts of interest between interacting individuals.
  • Evolutionary pressures may favor resistance to manipulation in manipulated individuals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the coevolution of manipulation and resistance in social interactions.
  • To determine if conflicts arising from social manipulation can be resolved through evolution.
  • To model the conditions under which social behaviors become mutually beneficial.

Main Methods:

  • Development and analysis of a mathematical model of social interaction.
  • Simulation of coevolutionary dynamics between manipulators and manipulated individuals.
  • Exploration of the role of costly inefficiency in the evolutionary process.

Main Results:

  • Coevolutionary processes can eliminate conflicts between social partners over manipulation.
  • Manipulated individuals may evolve to perform the manipulated behavior with greater efficiency.
  • Selection for resistance can disappear when the efficiency of the manipulated behavior increases sufficiently.

Conclusions:

  • Social manipulation can lead to the evolution of highly efficient, conflict-free social behaviors.
  • Costly inefficiency is a key factor enabling the resolution of manipulation conflicts.
  • The model provides a framework for understanding the evolution of advanced eusociality via maternal manipulation (AEMM).