Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Quantification of proton dose calculation accuracy in the lung
Clemens Grassberger1, Juliane Daartz2, Stephen Dowdell2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Proton Radiotherapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Monte Carlo (MC) calculations improve proton therapy accuracy for lung cancer, reducing target dose overestimation and range uncertainty. This enhances treatment quality and potentially lowers toxicity by enabling smaller margins.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Accurate dose calculation is critical for effective proton therapy, especially in lung cancer where tissue heterogeneity poses challenges.
- Clinical proton treatment planning systems (TPS) may have limitations in accurately modeling dose distributions in lung tissue.
- Monte Carlo (MC) simulations offer a more detailed approach to dose calculation but require validation for clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of a clinical proton treatment planning system (TPS) against Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculations using phantom and patient data.
- To assess the clinical impact of TPS versus MC dose calculations for lung tumors treated with proton therapy.
- To quantify the differences in dose to the target volume and organs at risk, as well as range uncertainties.
Main Methods:
- Dose measurements were performed using an ion chamber array in a lung phantom to determine dose and distal fall-off.
- Results from phantom measurements were compared with calculations from the TPS and MC simulations.
- MC dose distributions were simulated for 19 patients (54 fields) with lung tumors and compared to TPS calculations.
Main Results:
- MC calculations demonstrated superior accuracy in lung tissue, reproducing measurements within ±2% and showing a 1.6% average dose difference compared to TPS's 5.6%.
- MC simulations predicted a mean target dose 3.4% lower than TPS, with significant differences in small fields, and higher doses to normal lung (V5, V10) due to wider penumbra.
- MC reduced range uncertainty by approximately half compared to TPS (3.9 mm vs. 7 mm average difference), with potential for significant impact on critical structures distal to the target.
Conclusions:
- Integrating MC dose calculation into clinical practice can improve proton therapy for lung cancer by preventing systematic overestimation of target dose and underestimation of normal lung dose.
- MC's improved accuracy in range prediction allows for confident reduction of range margins, potentially leading to decreased toxicity for all patients.
- These findings support the clinical adoption of MC techniques to enhance the quality and safety of proton therapy for lung malignancies.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022