Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Evidence and causation in mental capacity assessments PC v City of York Council [2013] EWCA CIV 478
1School of Law, University of Salford, Salford, UK p.skowron@edu.salford.ac.uk.
Abstract:
McFarlane LJ's leading judgment in PC v City of York Council consistently stresses the 'plain' statutory language of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In doing so, it reveals how intractably difficult performing an assessment in accord with the Act can sometimes be. In particular, it raises questions about the sources of evidence upon which a finding of incapacity can be based, illustrates that causation under the Act may have been widely neglected, and highlights contestable assumptions that underlie the Act's 'decision-specific' approach to assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Cause and Effect
Causality in Epidemiology
Reason and Intuition
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...

