Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Dujarier's case].

J Glicenstein

    Annales De Chirurgie Plastique Et Esthetique
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary

    A 1926 plastic surgery complication led to a lawsuit, impacting the field. The case later established the necessity of informed consent for plastic surgery procedures.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Rejuvenate, it's as old as the hills…].

    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2018
    Same author

    [Nipple-areola complexity].

    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2018
    Same author

    [Pierre Mornard (1883-1929), unrecognized plastic surgeon].

    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2017
    Same author

    [The history of pediatric plastic surgery].

    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2016
    Same author

    [The history of facial paralysis].

    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2015
    Same author

    [Louis Ombrédanne (1871-1956) pediatric and plastic surgeon].

    Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2014

    Area of Science:

    • Medical History
    • Surgical Complications
    • Plastic Surgery Ethics

    Background:

    • A 1926 surgical case involving Charles Dujarier and a patient seeking leg aesthetic improvement resulted in severe complications, including gangrene and amputation.
    • The initial lawsuit imposed significant penalties on the surgeon and nearly led to the prohibition of plastic surgery.

    Discussion:

    • The case highlights the critical importance of surgical technique and patient safety in plastic surgery.
    • Legal ramifications of surgical errors underscore the need for rigorous standards and oversight in medical practice.
    • The legal outcome evolved, eventually clarifying the legitimacy of plastic surgery contingent upon informed patient consent.

    Key Insights:

    • Suture tension as a cause of post-operative gangrene and amputation.
    • The near-outlawing of plastic surgery due to a single adverse event.
    • Establishment of informed consent as a prerequisite for plastic surgery legality.

    Outlook:

    • The Dujarier case serves as a historical precedent in plastic surgery ethics and patient rights.
    • Emphasizes the ongoing evolution of medical-legal frameworks surrounding aesthetic procedures.
    • Reinforces the principle that patient autonomy and informed consent are paramount in surgical interventions.

    Related Experiment Videos