Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

09:09
Dissecting the Non-human Primate Brain in Stereotaxic Space
Published on: July 16, 2009
9.8K
Letter to the Editor: reexamining Penfield's Homunculus
1a Emmanuel College , Cambridge , United Kingdom.
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
|April 18, 2014
Summary
This letter addresses errors in a recent discussion of Penfield's homunculus diagram. It clarifies diagrammatic ambiguity, improper scaling issues, and disputes the superiority of the 1950s version.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Medical History
Background:
- A recent journal discussion examined Penfield's homunculus diagram.
- This analysis identified several inaccuracies in the interpretation and presentation of the diagram.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify ambiguities in the representation of Penfield's homunculus.
- To highlight issues related to the scaling of the homunculus diagram.
- To challenge the assertion of the 1950s version's superiority.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of the Penfield homunculus diagram.
- Review of existing literature and interpretations.
- Comparative assessment of different versions of the diagram.
Main Results:
- The diagram's supposed ambiguity is clarified.
- A significant problem of improper scaling is identified.
- The argument for the 1950s version's superiority is contested.
Conclusions:
- The interpretation of Penfield's homunculus requires careful attention to detail.
- Improper scaling presents a fundamental challenge to accurate representation.
- The 1950s version is not demonstrably superior to other representations.

