Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

11.6K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
11.6K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

37.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.5K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

27.6K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
27.6K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

20.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.1K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

19.0K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
19.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combinatorial decision-making driven by multicomponent surface condensates.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The origin and evolution of dorsal determination mechanisms in vertebrate paired appendages.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Dynamic remodeling of portal vessels by Clec4g+ endothelial cells in liver growth and homeostasis.

JCI insight·2026
Same author

An AI system to help scientists write expert-level empirical software.

Nature·2026
Same author

Liver Disease Reveals KIF12 as a Critical Regulator of Mitochondria, Lysosome and Cilia Localization.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Fitting coarse-grained models to macroscopic experimental data via automatic differentiation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Dissection and Downstream Analysis of Zebra Finch Embryos at Early Stages of Development
09:23

Dissection and Downstream Analysis of Zebra Finch Embryos at Early Stages of Development

Published on: June 21, 2014

12.2K

Shared developmental programme strongly constrains beak shape diversity in songbirds.

Joerg A Fritz1, Joseph Brancale2, Masayoshi Tokita2

  • 11] School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Kavli Institute for Bionano Science and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA [2].

Nature Communications
|April 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Bird beak diversity is shaped by developmental constraints. Songbird beak evolution is limited by restrictive rules in the growth zone, restricting variation to three key parameters.

More Related Videos

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development
04:10

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

1.3K
Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches
06:40

Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches

Published on: December 26, 2019

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Dissection and Downstream Analysis of Zebra Finch Embryos at Early Stages of Development
09:23

Dissection and Downstream Analysis of Zebra Finch Embryos at Early Stages of Development

Published on: June 21, 2014

12.2K
Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development
04:10

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

1.3K
Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches
06:40

Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches

Published on: December 26, 2019

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Developmental biology
  • Comparative anatomy

Background:

  • Bird beak diversity is a classic example of natural selection.
  • The developmental processes underlying beak shape variation are not fully understood.
  • Previous studies have focused on limited model systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the developmental constraints on songbird beak shape variation.
  • To determine the relative importance of developmental limitations versus natural selection.
  • To map developmental mechanisms across a diverse songbird phylogeny.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative morphometric analysis of beak shape in diverse songbirds.
  • Phylogenetic mapping of developmental traits.
  • Experimental analysis of cell proliferation in developing zebra finch beaks.

Main Results:

  • Songbird beak diversity is constrained to a three-parameter family of shapes (length, depth, shear).
  • Restrictive rules govern the dynamics of the proliferative growth zone.
  • Experimental data support the proposed developmental constraints.

Conclusions:

  • Shared properties of the growth zone's developmental program strongly constrain beak shape variability in songbirds.
  • Developmental pathways play a critical role in shaping evolutionary trajectories.
  • Understanding developmental constraints is key to explaining evolutionary diversity.